Web of Science:
Assessment of the global Copernicus, NASADEM, ASTER and AW3D digital elevation models in Central and Southern Africa

dc.contributor.authorOkolie, C.J.
dc.contributor.authorMills, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorAdeleke, A.K.
dc.contributor.authorSmit, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorPeppa, M.V.
dc.contributor.authorAltunel, A.O.
dc.contributor.authorArungwa, I.D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T05:38:56Z
dc.date.available2024-02-13T05:38:56Z
dc.date.issued2024.01.01
dc.description.abstractValidation studies of global Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) in the existing literature are limited by the diversity and spread of landscapes, terrain types considered and sparseness of groundtruth. Moreover, there are knowledge gaps on the accuracy variations in rugged and complex landscapes, and previous studies have often not relied on robust internal and external validation measures. Thus, there is still only partial understanding and limited perspective of the reliability and adequacy of global DEMs for several applications. In this study, we utilize a dense spread of LiDAR groundtruth to assess the vertical accuracies of four medium-resolution, readily available, free-access and global coverage 1 arc-second (30 m) DEMs: NASADEM, ASTER GDEM, Copernicus GLO-30, and ALOS World 3D (AW3D). The assessment is carried out at landscapes spread across Cape Town, Southern Africa (urban/industrial, agricultural, mountain, peninsula and grassland/shrubland) and forested national parks in Gabon, Central Africa (low-relief tropical rainforest and high-relief tropical rainforest). The statistical analysis is based on robust accuracy metrics that cater for normal and non-normal elevation error distribution, and error ranking. In Cape Town, Copernicus DEM generally had the least vertical error with an overall Mean Error (ME) of 0.82 m and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 2.34 m while ASTER DEM had the poorest performance. However, ASTER GDEM and NASADEM performed better in the low-relief and high-relief tropical forests of Gabon. Generally, the DEM errors have a moderate to high positive correlation in forests, and a low to moderate positive correlation in mountains and urban areas. Copernicus DEM showed superior vertical accuracy in forests with less than 40% tree cover, while ASTER and NASADEM performed better in denser forests with tree cover greater than 70%. This study is a robust regional assessment of these global DEMs.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10095020.2023.2296010
dc.identifier.eissn1993-5153
dc.identifier.endpage
dc.identifier.issn1009-5020
dc.identifier.issue
dc.identifier.startpage
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=dspace_ku&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001155143800001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/19023
dc.identifier.volume
dc.identifier.wos001155143800001
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofGEO-SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectGlobal digital elevation model
dc.subjectNASADEM
dc.subjectASTER
dc.subjectALOS World 3D
dc.subjectCopernicus
dc.subjectLiDAR
dc.subjectNASA Land Vegetation and Ice Sensor (LVIS)
dc.subjectheight error map
dc.titleAssessment of the global Copernicus, NASADEM, ASTER and AW3D digital elevation models in Central and Southern Africa
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typeWos

Files