Web of Science:
Personalized bleeding management in total knee arthroplasty using reference change value: comparative analysis of tourniquet versus non-tourniquet techniques

dc.contributor.authorUgur, F.
dc.contributor.authorBildirici, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorTaskin, R.
dc.contributor.authorAkar, B.
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, M.
dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz, E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-19T05:49:11Z
dc.date.issued2025.01.01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for the treatment of advanced-stage knee osteoarthritis. This study aims to compare perioperative blood loss between tourniquet-assisted and tourniquet-free TKA using the reference change value (RCV), a personalized analytical tool that accounts for both biological and analytical variability. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 137 patients (tourniquet group (n = 68) and non-tourniquet group (n = 69) who underwent primary TKA. Hematological parameters-including red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), and hematocrit (HCT)-were evaluated preoperatively, on the day of surgery, and on postoperative day one. Blood loss was assessed using both conventional statistical methods and RCV-based analysis. Results No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age and gender (p > 0.05). Although preoperative hemoglobin levels were significantly different between groups (p < 0.05), there were no significant intergroup differences in pre- or postoperative RBC and HCT values. Traditional statistical analysis showed no significant difference in blood loss (p > 0.05). However, RCV analysis revealed that while bleeding had stabilized by the first postoperative day in the non-tourniquet group, it remained significantly elevated in the tourniquet group. Conclusions The findings suggest that RCV offers a more individualized and sensitive approach to assessing perioperative blood loss in TKA. Although conventional methods did not demonstrate significant differences, RCV analysis indicated a more rapid hemostatic response in the non-tourniquet group. Incorporating RCV into routine clinical practice may enhance patient-specific blood management and support earlier postoperative decision making.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00402-025-05946-1
dc.identifier.eissn1434-3916
dc.identifier.endpage
dc.identifier.issn0936-8051
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=dspace_ku&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001504315300004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/34481
dc.identifier.volume145
dc.identifier.wos001504315300004
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTotal knee arthroplasty
dc.subjectPerioperative blood loss
dc.subjectReference change value
dc.subjectTourniquet
dc.subjectIndividualized hemostasis assessment
dc.titlePersonalized bleeding management in total knee arthroplasty using reference change value: comparative analysis of tourniquet versus non-tourniquet techniques
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typeWos

Files