Web of Science:
Seasonal habitat-use patterns of large mammals in a human-dominated landscape

dc.contributor.authorDagtekin, D
dc.contributor.authorErtürk, A
dc.contributor.authorSommer, S
dc.contributor.authorOzgul, A
dc.contributor.authorSoyumert, A
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T05:46:38Z
dc.date.available2023-12-20T05:46:38Z
dc.date.issued2023.01.01
dc.description.abstractLarge mammals in temperate climates typically display seasonal patterns of habitat use. However, these patterns are often overlooked because large mammals are usually surveyed at annual intervals. In addition, most studies focus on a single species and ignore other species with which the focal species could interact. Knowing seasonal patterns of habitat use in multiple species and understanding factors that cause these patterns can provide further detail on population dynamics and guide effective conservation planning. Here, using dynamic occupancy modeling, we analyze 11 years of camera-trap data collected in northwestern Anatolia, Turkey, to investigate seasonal habitat use of 8 large-mammal species: Brown Bear (Ursus arctos), Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx), Gray Wolf (Canis lupus), Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes), Wild Boar (Sus scrofa), Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus), European Hare (Lepus europaeus), and Red Deer (Cervus elaphus). For each species, we study the strength of seasonality in habitat use and its dependence on human population density and elevation, which have been shown to affect distributions of species in the region. Although all species exhibited seasonality in habitat use, the strength of this seasonality varied among species; it was strongest in Wild Boar, Roe Deer, and Brown Bear. Moreover, except for Brown Bear, all species tended to avoid sites close to humans. The species responded differently to changing elevation; increasing elevation had both positive and negative effects on species-specific colonization and desertion probabilities, and these effects were likely related to either feeding habits or tendency to avoid humans. These results indicate that seasonality should be taken into consideration in population studies. However, because species differ, seasonality patterns should be identified separately for each species of interest, as differences in these patterns can explain the underlying dynamics of habitat-use patterns more accurately. How does environmental seasonality affect habitat use of 8 large-mammal species in northwestern Anatolia, Turkey? We show that the strength of seasonality in habitat use varies among the species. These variations have direct implications for conservation.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jmammal/gyad107
dc.identifier.eissn1545-1542
dc.identifier.endpage
dc.identifier.issn0022-2372
dc.identifier.issue
dc.identifier.startpage
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=dspace_ku&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001114023800001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/18044
dc.identifier.volume
dc.identifier.wos001114023800001
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
dc.subjectBayesian
dc.subjectcamera trap
dc.subjecthierarchical models
dc.subjectimperfect detection
dc.subjectlarge mammals
dc.subjectoccupancy modeling
dc.subjectseasonality
dc.titleSeasonal habitat-use patterns of large mammals in a human-dominated landscape
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typeWos

Files