TRDizin:
Different Views of Laws of Nature

dc.contributor.authorÖmer Fatih TEKİN
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-14T23:09:41Z
dc.date.available2023-04-14T23:09:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.description.abstractThere are roughly two main understanding in philosophy of science: Epistemology of Science and Metaphysics of Science. It is examined that some concept such as Laws of Nature, Causation, Time and Space into the metaphysics of Science. In this paper, it has been studied laws of nature which is one the most important subjects in metaphysics of science. Let's think outside the box, there are three significant views about laws of nature; Regularity Theory, Necessitation Theory and Dispositional Essential views. It has been worked the views of David Lewis in regularity theory. In the section of nomic necessitation we have been scrutinised the arguments put forward by David Armstrong and finally the last section; it has been discussed Alexander Bird's views of dispositional essentialism comparing with the other two aspects.
dc.identifier.citationTeki̇n, Ö. (2017). Different Views of Laws of Nature. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 7(1), 43-63
dc.identifier.doi
dc.identifier.eissn1303-8303
dc.identifier.endpage63
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage43
dc.identifier.trdizin231614
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/detail/231614/different-views-of-laws-of-nature
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/8054
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBeytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleDifferent Views of Laws of Nature
dc.typeRESEARCH
dspace.entity.typeTrdizin
local.indexed.atTrDizin

Files