Scopus:
Development, characterization, and performance analysis of shape-stabilized phase change material included-geopolymer for passive thermal management of buildings

dc.contributor.authorGencel O.
dc.contributor.authorHarja M.
dc.contributor.authorSarı A.
dc.contributor.authorHekimoğlu G.
dc.contributor.authorUstaoğlu A.
dc.contributor.authorSutcu M.
dc.contributor.authorErdogmus E.
dc.contributor.authorKaplan G.
dc.contributor.authorBayraktar O.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-11T22:17:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T00:29:06Z
dc.date.available2023-04-11T22:17:18Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T00:29:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-01
dc.description.abstractThe cooperation between phase change materials (PCMs) and geopolymer (GP) is energy-efficient way for improving the thermal performance of construction materials. This study discusses the effect of PCM combination with GP matrix on obtained concretes' mechanical and thermal properties. Attapulgite/lauric-capric acid eutectic mixture (ATP/LCEM) composite was fabricated as shape-stable composite phase change material (SSPCM) and then integrated with GP concrete (GPC) for improvement of the thermal mass of buildings. Thermal, mechanical, physical, morphological, thermal energy storage (TES) characteristics, and solar thermoregulation performances of the developed GPC-SSPCMs were experimentally characterized. The compressive strength was found over 6 MPa for GPC without aggregates (only SSPCM). The compressive and flexural strengths were relatively low, but above the requirements of the current standards. Other properties as thermal conductivity and solar performance make the produced GPC-SSPCMs promising materials for advanced TES applications in buildings. The apparent porosity was around 45% for GPC-SSPCM-50 and 63% for GPC-SSPCM-100, while water adsorption around 21% for GPC-SSPCM-50 and 30% for GPC-SSPCM-100. Thermal conductivity values of 0.375 W/mK for GPC without aggregates recommended this material as an insulator. The produced SSPCM composite melts at 19.00°C with corresponding latent heat of 73.9 J/g, while the GPC-SSPCM melts at 18.30°C with corresponding latent heat of 6.57 J/g. Based on the obtained outcomes, the energy-saving was determined as 5.56 kWh, which is corresponding to the CO2 saving of 15 kg-CO2, 14.68 kg-CO2, and 2.41 kg-CO2 in case of using coal, natural gas, or electricity, respectively as energy source.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/er.8735
dc.identifier.issn0363907X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137919172
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/3798
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Energy Research
dc.rightsfalse
dc.subjectattapulgite | capric acid | eutectic mixture | fly ash | geopolymer concrete | lauric acid | phase change material | thermal energy storage
dc.titleDevelopment, characterization, and performance analysis of shape-stabilized phase change material included-geopolymer for passive thermal management of buildings
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typeScopus
oaire.citation.issue15
oaire.citation.volume46
person.affiliation.nameBartin Üniversitesi
person.affiliation.nameUniversitatea Tehnica Gh. Asachi din IasI
person.affiliation.nameKaradeniz Technical University
person.affiliation.nameKaradeniz Technical University
person.affiliation.nameBartin Üniversitesi
person.affiliation.nameİzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi
person.affiliation.nameBartin Üniversitesi
person.affiliation.nameAtatürk Üniversitesi
person.affiliation.nameKastamonu University
person.identifier.scopus-author-id26436351300
person.identifier.scopus-author-id23004906900
person.identifier.scopus-author-id7006342950
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57205656345
person.identifier.scopus-author-id56829509700
person.identifier.scopus-author-id15063501200
person.identifier.scopus-author-id54398363600
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57118954700
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57204601046
relation.isPublicationOfScopusf9d36fa1-7ecc-48b2-a9c6-2d7b9a9efbf6
relation.isPublicationOfScopus.latestForDiscoveryf9d36fa1-7ecc-48b2-a9c6-2d7b9a9efbf6

Files