Scopus:
Reflective practice tools in ESL: Two retrospective evaluations

dc.contributor.authorUnlu Z.
dc.contributor.authorKulekci E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T01:28:15Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T01:28:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-01
dc.description.abstractThis article evaluates the use of reflective practice (RP) tools by focusing on the main critiques on RP. In the literature, RP has often been criticised for its design-related problems, RP's being directed by problem identification purposes rather than empirical data, and RP practitioners' loss of contact with their discourse communities due to the undue emphasis on practical knowledge. Therefore, this article suggests methodological and data triangulation of RP tools as well as highlighting the community of inquiry framework to overcome the aforementioned problems While doing this, the authors reflect on their own RPs, both of which were conducted at a refugee centre in Philadelphia, USA. In this examination, the critical role of reflective tools is highlighted.
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/applirev-2017-0075
dc.identifier.issn18686303
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85052651914
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/4799
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Linguistics Review
dc.rightsfalse
dc.subjectReflective practice criticisms | reflective practice tools | retrospective RP evaluation
dc.titleReflective practice tools in ESL: Two retrospective evaluations
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typeScopus
local.indexed.atScopus
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.volume11
person.affiliation.nameTokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi
person.affiliation.nameKastamonu University
person.identifier.scopus-author-id56473522400
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57203689704
relation.isPublicationOfScopus15dcf73c-b8ae-467f-b67f-a85fbedda69a
relation.isPublicationOfScopus.latestForDiscovery15dcf73c-b8ae-467f-b67f-a85fbedda69a

Files