Pubmed:
Evaluation of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Algorithms' Diagnostic Efficacy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet Models

dc.contributor.authorKoyun, M.
dc.contributor.authorTaskent, I.
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T12:25:28Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T12:25:28Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractAcute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, with early and accurate diagnosis being critical for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes. This retrospective study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of two advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT-4o) and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, in identifying AIS from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The DWI images of a total of 110 cases (AIS group: = 55, healthy controls: = 55) were provided to the AI models via standardized prompts. The models' responses were compared to radiologists' gold-standard evaluations, and performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Both models exhibited a high sensitivity for AIS detection (ChatGPT-4o: 100%, Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 94.5%). However, ChatGPT-4o demonstrated a significantly lower specificity (3.6%) compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet (74.5%). The agreement with radiologists was poor for ChatGPT-4o (κ = 0.036; %95 CI: -0.013, 0.085) but good for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (κ = 0.691; %95 CI: 0.558, 0.824). In terms of the AIS hemispheric localization accuracy, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (67.2%) outperformed ChatGPT-4o (32.7%). Similarly, for specific AIS localization, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (30.9%) showed greater accuracy than ChatGPT-4o (7.3%), with these differences being statistically significant ( < 0.05). This study highlights the superior diagnostic performance of Claude 3.5 Sonnet compared to ChatGPT-4o in identifying AIS from DWI. Despite its advantages, both models demonstrated notable limitations in accuracy, emphasizing the need for further development before achieving full clinical applicability. These findings underline the potential of AI tools in radiological diagnostics while acknowledging their current limitations.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm14020571
dc.identifier.pubmed39860577
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/34106
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectChatGPT
dc.subjectClaude
dc.subjectacute ischemic stroke
dc.subjectartificial intelligence
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectradiology
dc.titleEvaluation of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Algorithms' Diagnostic Efficacy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet Models
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePubmed
local.indexed.atPubMed
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9811-4385
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6278-7863

Files