Yayın: Optimisation of sourdough bread incorporation into wheat bread by response surface methodology: Bioactive and nutritional properties
| dc.contributor.author | Hayta, Mehmet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hendek Ertop, Muge | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-03T10:03:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-05-12 | |
| dc.description.abstract | SummaryThe optimisation of the quantity of sourdough (A) prepared with two different fermentation methods, [spontaneous fermentation (F1) vs. starter oflactic acid bacteria‐added fermentation (F2)], instant active dry yeast (B) and wheat bran (C) for a nutritionally improved bread formulation has been studied by evaluating the bioavailability and bioactive properties. The bread produced according to the optimised formula and fermentation types of F1 (OBF1) and F2 (OBF2) was compared with control bread (CB). The optimised levels for F1 were 11.45% for sourdough, 1.10% for dry yeast and 1.58% for wheat bran and for F2 6.99% for sourdough, 1.02% for dry yeast and 38.84% for wheat bran. The addition of sourdough significantly (P < 0.05) affected antioxidant activity, total phenolic content,in vitroash and protein digestibility, and enzyme resistance starch contents of bread. The F1 fermentation method was found to be more effective in terms of bread properties examined. | |
| dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13457 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13457 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://avesis.erciyes.edu.tr/publication/details/56b08716-a7e4-471e-8f17-c84c090fb610/oai | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ijfs.13457 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1365-2621 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 1835 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0950-5423 | |
| dc.identifier.openaire | doi_dedup___::97d75e9156ce7cd36ce065adca902b85 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-4300-7790 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85018909909 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 1828 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/36454 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 52 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 000405790100012 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Food Science & Technology | |
| dc.rights | CLOSED | |
| dc.subject.sdg | 2. Zero hunger | |
| dc.title | Optimisation of sourdough bread incorporation into wheat bread by response surface methodology: Bioactive and nutritional properties | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.api.response | {"authors":[{"fullName":"Mehmet Hayta","name":"Mehmet","surname":"Hayta","rank":1,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Muge Hendek Ertop","name":"Muge","surname":"Hendek Ertop","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-4300-7790"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"2. Zero hunger"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0404 agricultural biotechnology"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"04 agricultural and veterinary sciences"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Optimisation of sourdough bread incorporation into wheat bread by response surface methodology: Bioactive and nutritional properties","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>The optimisation of the quantity of sourdough (A) prepared with two different fermentation methods, [spontaneous fermentation (F1) vs. starter of<jats:italic>lactic acid bacteria</jats:italic>‐added fermentation (F2)], instant active dry yeast (B) and wheat bran (C) for a nutritionally improved bread formulation has been studied by evaluating the bioavailability and bioactive properties. The bread produced according to the optimised formula and fermentation types of F1 (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OB<jats:sub>F</jats:sub></jats:styled-content><jats:sub>1</jats:sub>) and F2 (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OB<jats:sub>F</jats:sub></jats:styled-content><jats:sub>2</jats:sub>) was compared with control bread (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CB</jats:styled-content>). The optimised levels for F1 were 11.45% for sourdough, 1.10% for dry yeast and 1.58% for wheat bran and for F2 6.99% for sourdough, 1.02% for dry yeast and 38.84% for wheat bran. The addition of sourdough significantly (<jats:italic>P </jats:italic><<jats:italic> </jats:italic>0.05) affected antioxidant activity, total phenolic content,<jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic>ash and protein digestibility, and enzyme resistance starch contents of bread. The F1 fermentation method was found to be more effective in terms of bread properties examined.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2017-05-12","publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"International Journal of Food Science & Technology","issnPrinted":"0950-5423","issnOnline":"1365-2621","issnLinking":null,"ep":"1835","iss":null,"sp":"1828","vol":"52","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::97d75e9156ce7cd36ce065adca902b85","originalIds":["10.1111/ijfs.13457","50|doiboost____|97d75e9156ce7cd36ce065adca902b85","2611982737","56b08716-a7e4-471e-8f17-c84c090fb610","50|od______9447::b6351ec3be56b21931976eaffd25def7"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/ijfs.13457"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":27,"influence":3.5470766e-9,"popularity":1.5536036e-8,"impulse":10,"citationClass":"C4","influenceClass":"C4","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/ijfs.13457"}],"license":"Wiley Online Library User Agreement","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13457"],"publicationDate":"2017-05-12","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"2611982737"},{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/ijfs.13457"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13457"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/ijfs.13457"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://avesis.erciyes.edu.tr/publication/details/56b08716-a7e4-471e-8f17-c84c090fb610/oai"],"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false} | |
| local.import.source | OpenAire | |
| local.indexed.at | WOS | |
| local.indexed.at | Scopus |
