Yayın:
Intrastromal Suturing Technique Compared With Interrupted Corneal Suturing Technique, Loose Suture and Knot Exposure: A Comparative Rabbit Study

dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Bahri
dc.contributor.authorUcgul, Ahmet Yucel
dc.contributor.authorBayrakceken, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorOzmen, Mehmet Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorAkata, Rustu Fikret
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T21:54:10Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-08
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an innovative intrastromal suturing technique in an experimental rabbit model, comparing it to standard interrupted suturing, loose suture, and suturing with knot exposure. Methods Fourteen adult male New Zealand White rabbits were included in this study. Each rabbit underwent suturing in both eyes, divided into four groups based on suturing techniques. The novel intrastromal suturing technique involved burying the entire suture material within the corneal stroma. Corneal neovascularisation (CoNV) areas were evaluated by image analysis and immune cell densities by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). Results The intrastromal suturing group demonstrated significantly smaller CoNV areas at both 1 week and 1 month post-suturing compared to other interventional groups, indicating effective mitigation of CoNV development and progression. Moreover, this group exhibited lower immune cell densities in the superficial stromal layer and endothelial layer, suggesting a reduced inflammatory response. Both the loose suture and the knot exposure groups exhibited significant levels of CoNV and heightened immune cell densities. Conclusion This experimental study demonstrated effectiveness of intrastromal suturing technique in limiting CoNV and immune cell infiltration, common contributors to graft rejection and complications. Furthermore, the study revealed that loose sutures and those with exposed knots are likely to cause more severe CoNV and inflammation, compared to the traditional interrupted suturing technique and intrastromal suturing.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251328456
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40200392
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/15533506251328456
dc.identifier.eissn1553-3514
dc.identifier.endpage333
dc.identifier.issn1553-3506
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::a99928d504d5481c5a1b3664f5d091c6
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9617-6961
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3164-6336
dc.identifier.pubmed40200392
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002870858
dc.identifier.startpage325
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/42610
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Innovation
dc.rightsCLOSED
dc.titleIntrastromal Suturing Technique Compared With Interrupted Corneal Suturing Technique, Loose Suture and Knot Exposure: A Comparative Rabbit Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Kaan Ozkan","name":"Kaan","surname":"Ozkan","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0002-9617-6961"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Bahri Aydın","name":"Bahri","surname":"Aydın","rank":2,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Ahmet Yucel Ucgul","name":"Ahmet Yucel","surname":"Ucgul","rank":3,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Kemal Bayrakceken","name":"Kemal","surname":"Bayrakceken","rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Mehmet Cuneyt Ozmen","name":"Mehmet Cuneyt","surname":"Ozmen","rank":5,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0002-3164-6336"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Rustu Fikret Akata","name":"Rustu Fikret","surname":"Akata","rank":6,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":null,"mainTitle":"Intrastromal Suturing Technique Compared With Interrupted Corneal Suturing Technique, Loose Suture and Knot Exposure: A Comparative Rabbit Study","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an innovative intrastromal suturing technique in an experimental rabbit model, comparing it to standard interrupted suturing, loose suture, and suturing with knot exposure.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Fourteen adult male New Zealand White rabbits were included in this study. Each rabbit underwent suturing in both eyes, divided into four groups based on suturing techniques. The novel intrastromal suturing technique involved burying the entire suture material within the corneal stroma. Corneal neovascularisation (CoNV) areas were evaluated by image analysis and immune cell densities by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>The intrastromal suturing group demonstrated significantly smaller CoNV areas at both 1 week and 1 month post-suturing compared to other interventional groups, indicating effective mitigation of CoNV development and progression. Moreover, this group exhibited lower immune cell densities in the superficial stromal layer and endothelial layer, suggesting a reduced inflammatory response. Both the loose suture and the knot exposure groups exhibited significant levels of CoNV and heightened immune cell densities.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>This experimental study demonstrated effectiveness of intrastromal suturing technique in limiting CoNV and immune cell infiltration, common contributors to graft rejection and complications. Furthermore, the study revealed that loose sutures and those with exposed knots are likely to cause more severe CoNV and inflammation, compared to the traditional interrupted suturing technique and intrastromal suturing.</jats:p> </jats:sec>"],"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publisher":"SAGE Publications","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","issnPrinted":"1553-3506","issnOnline":"1553-3514","issnLinking":null,"ep":"333","iss":null,"sp":"325","vol":"32","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::a99928d504d5481c5a1b3664f5d091c6","originalIds":["10.1177/15533506251328456","50|doiboost____|a99928d504d5481c5a1b3664f5d091c6","40200392"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1177/15533506251328456"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"40200392"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":0,"influence":2.5349236e-9,"popularity":2.8669784e-9,"impulse":0,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1177/15533506251328456"}],"license":"https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251328456"],"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"40200392"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1177/15533506251328456"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40200392"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atPubMed

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar