Yayın:
Comparison of Resorption in Autogenous Dorsal Onlay Cartilage Grafts: An Experimental Study

dc.contributor.authorÖner, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKozan, Günay
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T20:26:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-28
dc.description.abstractAbstract Objectives The present study was designed to compare the graft resorption characteristics of autogenous cartilage from the septum, auricle, and costal in the superficial muscular aponeurotic system of the nasal dorsum of the rabbit model. Methods Equal-sized perichondrium-free septal, auricular, and costal cartilage grafts were collected from fifteen New Zealand white rabbits. Cartilage grafts were taken at the scale of two grafts from each animal’s ear, two from its costal part, and one from its septum. Costal cartilage grafts that were shaped with a micro-motor device and monopolar electrocautery, elastic cartilage grafts that were shaped with a micro-motor device and monopolar electrocautery, and septal cartilage grafts that were shaped with a scalpel were all implanted into the dorsum of rabbit’s noses to create five groups. All autogenous cartilage tissues were removed 3 months later. Cartilages were evaluated for histological features, graft mass, and chondrocyte density resorption. Results The elastic cartilage group, where electrocautery was used to shape the cartilage, had a higher resorption score than the other groups. The costal cartilage graft shaped with a micro-motor was also observed to have the best cartilage regeneration score. Conclusion We observed that the resorption of costal cartilage was lower than that of ear and septum cartilage. It was determined that micro-motor application for the shaping process caused less resorption and stimulated more regeneration than cautery application. Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38806831
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7
dc.description.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/29802
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7
dc.identifier.eissn1432-5241
dc.identifier.endpage4341
dc.identifier.issn0364-216X
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::310adb0486c2505251cf92ee87ac47aa
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6195-3110
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8676-6175
dc.identifier.pubmed38806831
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194535795
dc.identifier.startpage4333
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/41806
dc.identifier.volume48
dc.identifier.wos001234290700006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofAesthetic Plastic Surgery
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectCostal Cartilage
dc.subjectRabbit model
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectAutogenous cartilage
dc.subjectOriginal Articles
dc.subjectRabbits
dc.subjectEar Cartilage
dc.subjectRhinoplasty
dc.subjectTransplantation, Autologous
dc.subjectCartilage resorption
dc.subjectNasal Septum
dc.titleComparison of Resorption in Autogenous Dorsal Onlay Cartilage Grafts: An Experimental Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Fatih Öner","name":"Fatih","surname":"Öner","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0001-6195-3110"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Günay Kozan","name":"Günay","surname":"Kozan","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-8676-6175"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":"hybrid","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Costal Cartilage"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"03 medical and health sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Rabbit model"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0302 clinical medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Animals"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Autogenous cartilage"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Original Articles"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Rabbits"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Ear Cartilage"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Rhinoplasty"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Transplantation, Autologous"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Cartilage resorption"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Nasal Septum"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Comparison of Resorption in Autogenous Dorsal Onlay Cartilage Grafts: An Experimental Study","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Objectives</jats:title> <jats:p>The present study was designed to compare the graft resorption characteristics of autogenous cartilage from the septum, auricle, and costal in the superficial muscular aponeurotic system of the nasal dorsum of the rabbit model.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Equal-sized perichondrium-free septal, auricular, and costal cartilage grafts were collected from fifteen New Zealand white rabbits. Cartilage grafts were taken at the scale of two grafts from each animal’s ear, two from its costal part, and one from its septum. Costal cartilage grafts that were shaped with a micro-motor device and monopolar electrocautery, elastic cartilage grafts that were shaped with a micro-motor device and monopolar electrocautery, and septal cartilage grafts that were shaped with a scalpel were all implanted into the dorsum of rabbit’s noses to create five groups. All autogenous cartilage tissues were removed 3 months later. Cartilages were evaluated for histological features, graft mass, and chondrocyte density resorption.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>The elastic cartilage group, where electrocautery was used to shape the cartilage, had a higher resorption score than the other groups. The costal cartilage graft shaped with a micro-motor was also observed to have the best cartilage regeneration score.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>We observed that the resorption of costal cartilage was lower than that of ear and septum cartilage. It was determined that micro-motor application for the shaping process caused less resorption and stimulated more regeneration than cautery application.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Level of Evidence III</jats:title> <jats:p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"http://www.springer.com/00266\">www.springer.com/00266</jats:ext-link>.</jats:p> </jats:sec>"],"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Aesthetic Plast Surg"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","issnPrinted":"0364-216X","issnOnline":"1432-5241","issnLinking":null,"ep":"4341","iss":null,"sp":"4333","vol":"48","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::310adb0486c2505251cf92ee87ac47aa","originalIds":["4134","10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7","50|doiboost____|310adb0486c2505251cf92ee87ac47aa","od_______267::c781ebbd6690731e460b9e49faace7b8","38806831","PMC11588928","50|od_______267::c781ebbd6690731e460b9e49faace7b8","oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:11588928","50|od______3346::31323929a0a31287cbe42a1ebd7a3b46","oai:acikerisim.dicle.edu.tr:11468/29802"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"38806831"},{"scheme":"pmc","value":"PMC11588928"},{"scheme":"handle","value":"11468/29802"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":1,"influence":2.6132079e-9,"popularity":3.2727778e-9,"impulse":1,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7"],"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"38806831"},{"scheme":"pmc","value":"PMC11588928"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38806831"],"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Other literature type","urls":["http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7"],"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"11468/29802"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04134-7","https://hdl.handle.net/11468/29802"],"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":true,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atPubMed

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar