Yayın:
Mixed Bacteriological Isolation Percentages from the Uterus of Cows Slaughtered due to Infertility

dc.contributor.authorRisvanli, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKalender, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorSafak, Tarık
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Burak Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKaragulle, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Oznur
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Mehmet Akif
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-05T22:44:09Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-21
dc.description.abstractBackground: Intrauterine mixed infections are an important problem in cattle breeding. In this study, we aimed to determine the mixed bacteriological isolation rates from the uterus of cows with clinical metritis and to reveal the relationships between the bacteria that isolated together.Methods: For this purpose, sterile swabs were taken from 490 uterus obtained from cattle slaughtered due to infertility in three slaughterhouses and used them to perform microbiological tests. After evaluating the data, it was determined that the bacterial isolation rate from uterus with clinical metritis was 76.14% (n = 268).Results: The rates for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 bacteria isolated from the uterus with clinical metritis were 48.13%, 33.96%, 15.30%, 2.24%, and 0.37%, respectively. The isolation rates for Trueperella pyogenes, Fusobacterium necrophorum, and Escherichia coli alone from the uterus with clinical metritis were 27.08%, 28.00%, and 16.51%, respectively. In uterus with clinical metritis, Staphylococcus aureus (16.67%) was the most commonly isolated bacteria with T. pyogenes, Clostridium spp. (16%) co-isolated with F. necrophorum, and coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.51%) and Bacillus spp. (16.51%) were detected with E. coli.Conclusion: As a result, it was concluded that when evaluating the microbiological results for cows with clinical metritis, mixed infections should be taken into more consideration, and the characteristics of the bacteria that isolate together should be considered during the treatment of mixed infections.Keywords: Cattle; Uterine; Isolation; infertility
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.62940/als.v9i4.1498
dc.description.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/8145
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.48623/aperta.260615
dc.identifier.doi10.62940/als.v9i4.1498
dc.identifier.eissn2310-5380
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::021a14688dbd6978d7e7904aec80d254
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5653-0025
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4653-1942
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6178-4641
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7256-9189
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6628-4515
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0424-9471
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1577-1556
dc.identifier.startpage521
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/43329
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.publisherThe Running Line
dc.relation.ispartofAdvancements in Life Sciences
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectUterine
dc.subjectCattle
dc.subjectinfertility
dc.subjectIsolation
dc.titleMixed Bacteriological Isolation Percentages from the Uterus of Cows Slaughtered due to Infertility
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Ali Risvanli","name":"Ali","surname":"Risvanli","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0001-5653-0025"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Hakan Kalender","name":"Hakan","surname":"Kalender","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0003-4653-1942"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Tarık Safak","name":"Tarık","surname":"Safak","rank":3,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0002-6178-4641"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Burak Fatih Yüksel","name":"Burak Fatih","surname":"Yüksel","rank":4,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-7256-9189"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Burcu Karagulle","name":"Burcu","surname":"Karagulle","rank":5,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0002-6628-4515"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Oznur Yılmaz","name":"Oznur","surname":"Yılmaz","rank":6,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0003-0424-9471"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Mehmet Akif Kilinc","name":"Mehmet Akif","surname":"Kilinc","rank":7,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0003-1577-1556"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Uterine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Cattle"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"infertility"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Isolation"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Mixed Bacteriological Isolation Percentages from the Uterus of Cows Slaughtered due to Infertility","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p>Background: Intrauterine mixed infections are an important problem in cattle breeding. In this study, we aimed to determine the mixed bacteriological isolation rates from the uterus of cows with clinical metritis and to reveal the relationships between the bacteria that isolated together.Methods: For this purpose, sterile swabs were taken from 490 uterus obtained from cattle slaughtered due to infertility in three slaughterhouses and used them to perform microbiological tests. After evaluating the data, it was determined that the bacterial isolation rate from uterus with clinical metritis was 76.14% (n = 268).Results: The rates for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 bacteria isolated from the uterus with clinical metritis were 48.13%, 33.96%, 15.30%, 2.24%, and 0.37%, respectively. The isolation rates for Trueperella pyogenes, Fusobacterium necrophorum, and Escherichia coli alone from the uterus with clinical metritis were 27.08%, 28.00%, and 16.51%, respectively. In uterus with clinical metritis, Staphylococcus aureus (16.67%) was the most commonly isolated bacteria with T. pyogenes, Clostridium spp. (16%) co-isolated with F. necrophorum, and coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.51%) and Bacillus spp. (16.51%) were detected with E. coli.Conclusion: As a result, it was concluded that when evaluating the microbiological results for cows with clinical metritis, mixed infections should be taken into more consideration, and the characteristics of the bacteria that isolate together should be considered during the treatment of mixed infections.Keywords: Cattle; Uterine; Isolation; infertility      </jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publisher":"The Running Line","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Advancements in Life Sciences","issnPrinted":null,"issnOnline":"2310-5380","issnLinking":null,"ep":null,"iss":null,"sp":"521","vol":"9","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::021a14688dbd6978d7e7904aec80d254","originalIds":["10.62940/als.v9i4.1498","50|doiboost____|021a14688dbd6978d7e7904aec80d254","oai:acikerisim.siirt.edu.tr:20.500.12604/8145","50|od______9478::6926d5afbd2fa1b846a2ecc5d8aa3613","oai:aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr:260615","50|r39c86a4b39b::ff42583710dc38e44bfa3db41a3f3c29"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.62940/als.v9i4.1498"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":0,"influence":2.5349236e-9,"popularity":2.1399287e-9,"impulse":0,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.62940/als.v9i4.1498"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.62940/als.v9i4.1498"],"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"type":"Article","urls":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/8145"],"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.48623/aperta.260615"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Other literature type","urls":["http://dx.doi.org/10.48623/aperta.260615"],"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":true,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar