Yayın:
Increasing the Performance of {[(1-x-y) LiCo0.3Cu0.7] (Al and Mg doped)] O2}, xLi2MnO3, yLiCoO2 Composites as Cathode Material in Lithium-Ion Battery: Synthesis and Characterization

dc.contributor.authorShahriari, Sara
dc.contributor.authorMollaamin, Fatemeh
dc.contributor.authorMonajjemi, Majid
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T18:20:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-18
dc.description.abstractTwenty-eight samples of {[(1-x-y) LiCo0.3Cu0.7](Al and Mg doped)]O2}, xLi2MnO3, and yLiCoO2 composites were synthesized using the sol–gel method. Stoichiometric weights of LiNO3, Mn(Ac)2⋅4H2O, Co(Ac)2⋅4H2O, Al(NO3)3.H2o, Mg(NO3)2⋅6H2O, and Cu(NO3)2.H2O for the preparation of these samples were applied. From this work, we confirmed the high performance of two samples, namely, Sample 18, including Al doped with structure “Li1.5Cu0.117Co0.366Al0.017Mn0.5O2” and Sample 17, including Mg doped with structure “Li1.667Cu0.1Mg0.017Co0.217Mn0.667O2”, compared with other compositions. Evidently, the used weight of cobalt in these two samples were lower compared with LiCoO2, resulting in advantages in the viewpoint of cost and toxicity problems. Charge and discharge characteristics of the mentioned cathode materials were investigated by performing cycle tests in the range of 2.2–4.5 V. These types of systems can help to reduce the disadvantages of cobalt arising from its high cost and toxic properties. Our results confirmed that the performance of such systems is similar to that of pure LiCoO2 cathode material, or greater in some cases. The biggest disadvantages of LiCoO2 are its cost and toxic properties, typically making it cost around five times more to manufacture than when using copper.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/mi14020241
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36837941
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14020241
dc.description.urihttps://doaj.org/article/53785cf706c24dee800c386297263d66
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14020241
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/mi14020241
dc.identifier.eissn2072-666X
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::4f866aeb59625d5a98dbe020000f7718
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6896-336x
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6665-837x
dc.identifier.pubmed36837941
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85149059538
dc.identifier.startpage241
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/40470
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wos000941543500001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofMicromachines
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectcathode materials
dc.subjectMg doping
dc.subjectlithium-ion batteries
dc.subjectAl doping
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectLiCoO<sub>2</sub>
dc.subjectTJ1-1570
dc.subjectlithium-ion batteries
dc.subjectAl doping
dc.subjectMg doping
dc.subjectcathode materials
dc.subjectLiCoO<sub>2</sub>
dc.subjectMechanical engineering and machinery
dc.subject.sdg7. Clean energy
dc.titleIncreasing the Performance of {[(1-x-y) LiCo0.3Cu0.7] (Al and Mg doped)] O2}, xLi2MnO3, yLiCoO2 Composites as Cathode Material in Lithium-Ion Battery: Synthesis and Characterization
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Sara Shahriari","name":"Sara","surname":"Shahriari","rank":1,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Fatemeh Mollaamin","name":"Fatemeh","surname":"Mollaamin","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-6896-336x"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Majid Monajjemi","name":"Majid","surname":"Monajjemi","rank":3,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-6665-837x"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"cathode materials"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Mg doping"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"lithium-ion batteries"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Al doping"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"02 engineering and technology"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"01 natural sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"7. Clean energy"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Article"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"LiCoO<sub>2</sub>"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0104 chemical sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"TJ1-1570"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"lithium-ion batteries; Al doping; Mg doping; cathode materials; LiCoO<sub>2</sub>"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Mechanical engineering and machinery"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0210 nano-technology"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Increasing the Performance of {[(1-x-y) LiCo0.3Cu0.7] (Al and Mg doped)] O2}, xLi2MnO3, yLiCoO2 Composites as Cathode Material in Lithium-Ion Battery: Synthesis and Characterization","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p>Twenty-eight samples of {[(1-x-y) LiCo0.3Cu0.7](Al and Mg doped)]O2}, xLi2MnO3, and yLiCoO2 composites were synthesized using the sol–gel method. Stoichiometric weights of LiNO3, Mn(Ac)2⋅4H2O, Co(Ac)2⋅4H2O, Al(NO3)3.H2o, Mg(NO3)2⋅6H2O, and Cu(NO3)2.H2O for the preparation of these samples were applied. From this work, we confirmed the high performance of two samples, namely, Sample 18, including Al doped with structure “Li1.5Cu0.117Co0.366Al0.017Mn0.5O2” and Sample 17, including Mg doped with structure “Li1.667Cu0.1Mg0.017Co0.217Mn0.667O2”, compared with other compositions. Evidently, the used weight of cobalt in these two samples were lower compared with LiCoO2, resulting in advantages in the viewpoint of cost and toxicity problems. Charge and discharge characteristics of the mentioned cathode materials were investigated by performing cycle tests in the range of 2.2–4.5 V. These types of systems can help to reduce the disadvantages of cobalt arising from its high cost and toxic properties. Our results confirmed that the performance of such systems is similar to that of pure LiCoO2 cathode material, or greater in some cases. The biggest disadvantages of LiCoO2 are its cost and toxic properties, typically making it cost around five times more to manufacture than when using copper.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publisher":"MDPI AG","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Micromachines (Basel)","Micromachines, Vol 14, Iss 2, p 241 (2023)","Micromachines; Volume 14; Issue 2; Pages: 241"],"formats":["application/pdf"],"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Micromachines","issnPrinted":null,"issnOnline":"2072-666X","issnLinking":null,"ep":null,"iss":null,"sp":"241","vol":"14","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::4f866aeb59625d5a98dbe020000f7718","originalIds":["mi14020241","10.3390/mi14020241","50|doiboost____|4f866aeb59625d5a98dbe020000f7718","od_______267::530f987f96bdb27192e6aba766d30e36","36837941","PMC9959737","oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9959737","50|od_______267::530f987f96bdb27192e6aba766d30e36","oai:doaj.org/article:53785cf706c24dee800c386297263d66","50|doajarticles::9e6d820d69e488e776f47130caade209","oai:mdpi.com:/2072-666X/14/2/241/","50|multidiscipl::a066cf796566a0f5c65dabd4a6091a81"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/mi14020241"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"36837941"},{"scheme":"pmc","value":"PMC9959737"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":29,"influence":3.3271024e-9,"popularity":2.4573042e-8,"impulse":29,"citationClass":"C4","influenceClass":"C4","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/mi14020241"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14020241"],"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"36837941"},{"scheme":"pmc","value":"PMC9959737"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/mi14020241"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36837941"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/mi14020241"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Other literature type","urls":["http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14020241"],"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/mi14020241"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doaj.org/article/53785cf706c24dee800c386297263d66"],"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/mi14020241"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Other literature type","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14020241"],"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":true,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atPubMed

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar