Yayın:
Study and evaluation of abrasive water jet turning process performance on AA5083

dc.contributor.authorKartal, F.
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T13:55:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-01
dc.description.abstractAbstractIn this study, the effect of processing parameters on surface roughness and macro surface characteristics was analyzed during the machining of Ø30 mm and 300 mm aluminum alloy AA5083 abrasive water jets. As the processing parameters (up to 10 mm min−1, 15 mm min−1, 20 mm min−1 and 25 mm min−1), abrasive flow rate (50 g min−1, 150 g min−1, 250 g min−1 and 350 g min−1), the lathe chuck rotational speed (25 min−1, 50 min−1, 75 min−1 and 100 min−1) and the nozzle approach distance (2 mm, 5 mm, 8 mm and 11 mm) were used in experiments. In experimental studies, the pump pressure (360 MPa) was used as a constant, in the form of an abrasive Garnet (100 mesh), and the nozzle diameter as 0.76 mm. According to the findings, the best results in terms of surface roughness were obtained as a result of turning speed and abrasive flow rate. When the macro surface characteristics were examined, it was found that the lathe chuck rotational speed increased, the rate of nozzle progression was low, the rate of abrasive flow was high and the nozzle approach distance was lower and the smoother surfaces were obtained.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201900099
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201900099
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mawe.201900099
dc.identifier.eissn1521-4052
dc.identifier.endpage220
dc.identifier.issn0933-5137
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::a35aaa8716a8d9f6c07eb3a5d1d30881
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2567-9705
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079587869
dc.identifier.startpage212
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/37820
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.wos000514257700009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofMaterialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik
dc.rightsCLOSED
dc.titleStudy and evaluation of abrasive water jet turning process performance on AA5083
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"F. Kartal","name":"F.","surname":"Kartal","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-2567-9705"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0209 industrial biotechnology"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"02 engineering and technology"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Study and evaluation of abrasive water jet turning process performance on AA5083","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In this study, the effect of processing parameters on surface roughness and macro surface characteristics was analyzed during the machining of Ø30 mm and 300 mm aluminum alloy AA5083 abrasive water jets. As the processing parameters (up to 10 mm min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, 15 mm min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, 20 mm min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and 25 mm min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), abrasive flow rate (50 g min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, 150 g min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, 250 g min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and 350 g min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), the lathe chuck rotational speed (25 min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, 50 min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, 75 min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and 100 min<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and the nozzle approach distance (2 mm, 5 mm, 8 mm and 11 mm) were used in experiments. In experimental studies, the pump pressure (360 MPa) was used as a constant, in the form of an abrasive Garnet (100 mesh), and the nozzle diameter as 0.76 mm. According to the findings, the best results in terms of surface roughness were obtained as a result of turning speed and abrasive flow rate. When the macro surface characteristics were examined, it was found that the lathe chuck rotational speed increased, the rate of nozzle progression was low, the rate of abrasive flow was high and the nozzle approach distance was lower and the smoother surfaces were obtained.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publisher":"Wiley","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik","issnPrinted":"0933-5137","issnOnline":"1521-4052","issnLinking":null,"ep":"220","iss":null,"sp":"212","vol":"51","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::a35aaa8716a8d9f6c07eb3a5d1d30881","originalIds":["10.1002/mawe.201900099","50|doiboost____|a35aaa8716a8d9f6c07eb3a5d1d30881","3008995703"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1002/mawe.201900099"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":6,"influence":2.9316625e-9,"popularity":5.5113616e-9,"impulse":4,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1002/mawe.201900099"}],"license":"Wiley Online Library User Agreement","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201900099"],"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3008995703"},{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1002/mawe.201900099"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201900099"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar