Yayın:
Complexity of major UK companies between 2006 and 2010: Hierarchical structure method approach

dc.contributor.authorDeviren, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorDoenmez, Cem Cagri
dc.contributor.authorKantar, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorKeski̇n, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorShirvani, Ayoub
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-02T22:53:09Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-01
dc.description.abstractAbstract This study reports on topology of the top 40 UK companies that have been analysed for predictive verification of markets for the period 2006–2010, applying the concept of minimal spanning tree and hierarchical tree (HT) analysis. Construction of the minimal spanning tree (MST) and the hierarchical tree (HT) is confined to a brief description of the methodology and a definition of the correlation function between a pair of companies based on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) index in order to quantify synchronization between the companies. A derivation of hierarchical organization and the construction of minimal-spanning and hierarchical trees for the 2006–2008 and 2008–2010 periods have been used and the results validate the predictive verification of applied semantics. The trees are known as useful tools to perceive and detect the global structure, taxonomy and hierarchy in financial data. From these trees, two different clusters of companies in 2006 were detected. They also show three clusters in 2008 and two between 2008 and 2010, according to their proximity. The clusters match each other as regards their common production activities or their strong interrelationship. The key companies are generally given by major economic activities as expected. This work gives a comparative approach between MST and HT methods from statistical physics and information theory with analysis of financial markets that may give new valuable and useful information of the financial market dynamics.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026
dc.description.urihttps://avesis.erciyes.edu.tr/publication/details/c0b08bf1-fda4-4840-9e53-1cdf2c6fbd1c/oai
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026
dc.identifier.endpage5131
dc.identifier.issn0378-4371
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::97faa6b73c95f3a9ac7552363883ef3e
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9302-1078
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84863989787
dc.identifier.startpage5121
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/35640
dc.identifier.volume391
dc.identifier.wos000307613500009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofPhysica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
dc.rightsCLOSED
dc.subject.sdg8. Economic growth
dc.titleComplexity of major UK companies between 2006 and 2010: Hierarchical structure method approach
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Deviren, Bayram","name":"Bayram","surname":"Deviren","rank":1,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Doenmez, Cem Cagri","name":"Cem Cagri","surname":"Doenmez","rank":2,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Kantar, Ersin","name":"Ersin","surname":"Kantar","rank":3,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0001-9302-1078"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"KESKİN, Mustafa","name":"Mustafa","surname":"Keski̇n","rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Ulusoy, Tolga","name":"Tolga","surname":"Ulusoy","rank":5,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Shirvani , Ayoub","name":"Ayoub","surname":"Shirvani","rank":6,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"8. Economic growth"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0502 economics and business"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0103 physical sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"05 social sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"01 natural sciences"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Complexity of major UK companies between 2006 and 2010: Hierarchical structure method approach","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["Abstract This study reports on topology of the top 40 UK companies that have been analysed for predictive verification of markets for the period 2006–2010, applying the concept of minimal spanning tree and hierarchical tree (HT) analysis. Construction of the minimal spanning tree (MST) and the hierarchical tree (HT) is confined to a brief description of the methodology and a definition of the correlation function between a pair of companies based on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) index in order to quantify synchronization between the companies. A derivation of hierarchical organization and the construction of minimal-spanning and hierarchical trees for the 2006–2008 and 2008–2010 periods have been used and the results validate the predictive verification of applied semantics. The trees are known as useful tools to perceive and detect the global structure, taxonomy and hierarchy in financial data. From these trees, two different clusters of companies in 2006 were detected. They also show three clusters in 2008 and two between 2008 and 2010, according to their proximity. The clusters match each other as regards their common production activities or their strong interrelationship. The key companies are generally given by major economic activities as expected. This work gives a comparative approach between MST and HT methods from statistical physics and information theory with analysis of financial markets that may give new valuable and useful information of the financial market dynamics."],"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publisher":"Elsevier BV","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications","issnPrinted":"0378-4371","issnOnline":null,"issnLinking":null,"ep":"5131","iss":null,"sp":"5121","vol":"391","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::97faa6b73c95f3a9ac7552363883ef3e","originalIds":["S0378437112000520","10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026","50|doiboost____|97faa6b73c95f3a9ac7552363883ef3e","1978973906","c0b08bf1-fda4-4840-9e53-1cdf2c6fbd1c","50|od______9447::fb630338c06921c3588b80a69f86ccaa"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":27,"influence":3.886357e-9,"popularity":8.199304e-9,"impulse":5,"citationClass":"C4","influenceClass":"C4","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026"}],"license":"Elsevier TDM","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026"],"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"1978973906"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.026"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://avesis.erciyes.edu.tr/publication/details/c0b08bf1-fda4-4840-9e53-1cdf2c6fbd1c/oai"],"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar