Yayın:
Effect of Chewing Gum and Stress Ball on Labor Pain, Duration of Labor, and Birth Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study

dc.contributor.authorŞi̇mşek Çeti̇nkaya, Şahika
dc.contributor.authorDurmuş, Ayşenur
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T20:19:22Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-16
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the effects of gum chewing (GG) and stress ball (BG) use on labor pain, labor duration, and birth satisfaction in women. Methods: This study was conducted in a maternity clinic as a randomized controlled experimental study. Ninety-six women were randomly divided into three groups. The sample of the study consisted of 96 pregnant women, 32 in the GG group, 32 in the BG use group, and 32 in the control group (CG). When the mother's pain began in the latent phase and active phase; The group using the BG had the BG squeezed for 20 min, the GG group had gum chewed for 20 min, and the CG received only standard care. Women were evaluated before and after the intervention in terms of pain intensity and postintervention satisfaction level. Personal information form, labor follow-up form, Visual Analog Scale, and birth satisfaction scale were used to collect data. Results: After the interventions, labor pain was less in the GG and BG groups than in the CG. At the same time, birth satisfaction in the GG and BG groups was higher than the CG (p<0.05). Conclusion: GG and using BG techniques are extremely effective in alleviating labor pain and satisfaction in primiparous women. There was no difference in labor pain reduction between the two interventions. These interventions have no effect on labor duration. These results show that GG and BG are effective nursing interventions for relieving labor pain and can be safely used.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/forbes.galenos.2024.71501
dc.description.urihttps://doaj.org/article/8ebffaf78f42441a990e8d1e9ba0cf31
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/forbes.galenos.2024.71501
dc.identifier.endpage58
dc.identifier.issn2717-9443
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::1824d6faa882c663a28878c8a1202b76
dc.identifier.startpage51
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/41724
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.publisherGalenos Yayinevi
dc.relation.ispartofForbes Journal of Medicine
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectMedicine (General)
dc.subjectR5-920
dc.subjectnursing
dc.subjectlabor pain
dc.subjectchewing gum
dc.subjectsatisfaction
dc.subjectwomen
dc.subjectmidwifery
dc.subject.sdg3. Good health
dc.titleEffect of Chewing Gum and Stress Ball on Labor Pain, Duration of Labor, and Birth Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Şahika ŞİMŞEK ÇETİNKAYA","name":"Şahika","surname":"Şi̇mşek Çeti̇nkaya","rank":1,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Ayşenur DURMUŞ","name":"Ayşenur","surname":"Durmuş","rank":2,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Medicine (General)"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"R5-920"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"nursing"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"labor pain"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"chewing gum"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"satisfaction"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"women"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"midwifery"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"3. Good health"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Effect of Chewing Gum and Stress Ball on Labor Pain, Duration of Labor, and Birth Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["Objective: To investigate the effects of gum chewing (GG) and stress ball (BG) use on labor pain, labor duration, and birth satisfaction in women. Methods: This study was conducted in a maternity clinic as a randomized controlled experimental study. Ninety-six women were randomly divided into three groups. The sample of the study consisted of 96 pregnant women, 32 in the GG group, 32 in the BG use group, and 32 in the control group (CG). When the mother's pain began in the latent phase and active phase; The group using the BG had the BG squeezed for 20 min, the GG group had gum chewed for 20 min, and the CG received only standard care. Women were evaluated before and after the intervention in terms of pain intensity and postintervention satisfaction level. Personal information form, labor follow-up form, Visual Analog Scale, and birth satisfaction scale were used to collect data. Results: After the interventions, labor pain was less in the GG and BG groups than in the CG. At the same time, birth satisfaction in the GG and BG groups was higher than the CG (p<0.05). Conclusion: GG and using BG techniques are extremely effective in alleviating labor pain and satisfaction in primiparous women. There was no difference in labor pain reduction between the two interventions. These interventions have no effect on labor duration. These results show that GG and BG are effective nursing interventions for relieving labor pain and can be safely used."],"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publisher":"Galenos Yayinevi","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Forbes Tıp Dergisi, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 51-58 (2024)"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Forbes Journal of Medicine","issnPrinted":"2717-9443","issnOnline":null,"issnLinking":null,"ep":"58","iss":null,"sp":"51","vol":"5","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::1824d6faa882c663a28878c8a1202b76","originalIds":["10.4274/forbes.galenos.2024.71501","50|doiboost____|1824d6faa882c663a28878c8a1202b76","oai:doaj.org/article:8ebffaf78f42441a990e8d1e9ba0cf31","50|doajarticles::5cee853578cd4967fa2108b64036baf0"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.4274/forbes.galenos.2024.71501"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":0,"influence":2.5349236e-9,"popularity":2.4744335e-9,"impulse":0,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.4274/forbes.galenos.2024.71501"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.4274/forbes.galenos.2024.71501"],"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.4274/forbes.galenos.2024.71501"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doaj.org/article/8ebffaf78f42441a990e8d1e9ba0cf31"],"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar