Yayın:
Cushioning capability analysis of seat foundations considering the sitter’s anthropometric dimensions

dc.contributor.authorHu, Lingling
dc.contributor.authorTor, Onder
dc.contributor.authorShen, Liming
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jilei
dc.contributor.authorQuin, Franklin
dc.contributor.authorYu, Xiaohong
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-06T13:27:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-04
dc.description.abstractSitting comfort is primarily determined by the cushioning capability of the seat foundation. Limited literature has been found related to the effects that different sized human buttocks had on the cushioning capability of the seat foundation. Moreover, there is no testing method specialized to measure the load-deformation behavior of foam cushions that imitates the sitting behavior between indenters with different sizes and seat support. This study investigated the effects of various indenter diameters (20 cm, 30 cm, 36 cm, 41 cm, 51 cm, and 58 cm), foam stiffness levels (high and low), and seat bases (spring versus solid flat panel) on the compressive load-deformation behavior of upholstered seat foundations. The load-deformation curves of all the tested foam-seat base combinations exhibited three typical regions, i.e., linear elasticity, plateau, and densification, when subjected to the loads applied through different indenter diameters. Statistical results indicated that the primary effects of the indenter diameter, foam stiffness level, and seat base had significant effects on the spring constants, which represented the slopes of lines in these three regions. In addition, a regression technique was proposed to derive power equations for the estimation of the spring constants of a seat foundation as a function of the indenter diameter, foam material stiffness, and seat base type.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007
dc.description.urihttps://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/BioRes_15_4_7992_Hu_TSZQY_Cushioning_Analysis_Seat_Foundation_Anthropo_Sitter_Dimensions_17752.pdf
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007
dc.identifier.doi10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007
dc.identifier.eissn1930-2126
dc.identifier.endpage8007
dc.identifier.issn1930-2126
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::07cbbd11b724f76deb54d0ff8a6f140a
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9405-1081
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119981571
dc.identifier.startpage7992
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/43983
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wos000583802900050
dc.publisherBioResources
dc.relation.ispartofBioResources
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.titleCushioning capability analysis of seat foundations considering the sitter’s anthropometric dimensions
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Lingling Hu","name":"Lingling","surname":"Hu","rank":1,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Onder Tor","name":"Onder","surname":"Tor","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-9405-1081"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Liming Shen","name":"Liming","surname":"Shen","rank":3,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Jilei Zhang","name":"Jilei","surname":"Zhang","rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Franklin Quin","name":"Franklin","surname":"Quin","rank":5,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Xiaohong Yu","name":"Xiaohong","surname":"Yu","rank":6,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"03 medical and health sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0205 materials engineering"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"02 engineering and technology"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0305 other medical science"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Cushioning capability analysis of seat foundations considering the sitter’s anthropometric dimensions","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p>Sitting comfort is primarily determined by the cushioning capability of the seat foundation. Limited literature has been found related to the effects that different sized human buttocks had on the cushioning capability of the seat foundation. Moreover, there is no testing method specialized to measure the load-deformation behavior of foam cushions that imitates the sitting behavior between indenters with different sizes and seat support. This study investigated the effects of various indenter diameters (20 cm, 30 cm, 36 cm, 41 cm, 51 cm, and 58 cm), foam stiffness levels (high and low), and seat bases (spring versus solid flat panel) on the compressive load-deformation behavior of upholstered seat foundations. The load-deformation curves of all the tested foam-seat base combinations exhibited three typical regions, i.e., linear elasticity, plateau, and densification, when subjected to the loads applied through different indenter diameters. Statistical results indicated that the primary effects of the indenter diameter, foam stiffness level, and seat base had significant effects on the spring constants, which represented the slopes of lines in these three regions. In addition, a regression technique was proposed to derive power equations for the estimation of the spring constants of a seat foundation as a function of the indenter diameter, foam material stiffness, and seat base type.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publisher":"BioResources","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"BioResources","issnPrinted":"1930-2126","issnOnline":"1930-2126","issnLinking":null,"ep":"8007","iss":null,"sp":"7992","vol":"15","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::07cbbd11b724f76deb54d0ff8a6f140a","originalIds":["10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007","50|doiboost____|07cbbd11b724f76deb54d0ff8a6f140a","3083342891"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":2,"influence":2.6552676e-9,"popularity":3.0931204e-9,"impulse":1,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007"],"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007"}],"license":"publisher-specific license","type":"Article","urls":["https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/BioRes_15_4_7992_Hu_TSZQY_Cushioning_Analysis_Seat_Foundation_Anthropo_Sitter_Dimensions_17752.pdf"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3083342891"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.4.7992-8007"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar