Yayın:
COMPARISON OF DOMINANT AND NONDOMINANT LEG STRENGTH AND HAMSTRING: QUADRICEPS RATIO IN PROFESSIONAL BASKETBALL PLAYERS

dc.contributor.authorAslankeser, Zübeyde
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorRevan, Serkan
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T16:49:54Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-26
dc.description.abstractThe literature has revealed that knee injuries are the most common injury among basketball players. The strength ratios dominant/non-dominant and posterior-anterior around the knee joint are used to evaluate strength balances. But there has been far less research published about strength evaluation in professional-level basketball. The objectives of the present study were: (i) to compare hamstring and quadriceps muscles’ strength values during concentric knee extension and flexion at different angular velocities at professional level basketballers, (ii) to determine dominant and non-dominant strength values during these contractions. 13 professional male basketball athletes voluntarily participated in the study. The leg strength was evaluated with an isokinetic dynamometer at 240- 180-120-600 /s angular velocities. The hamstring and quadriceps unilateral peak torque ratio (H/Q) and dominant non-dominant strength ratio were calculated. The independent t-test was computed to bilateral and unilateral strength outputs. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant and non-dominant strength values at peak torque, normalized peak torque, and H/Q at all angular velocities. Relative peak torque outputs in both legs were similar at all angular velocities. Also, the H/Q was calculated as ≥0.60 in all velocities. The results of this study suggest there were not any significant differences in the unilateral and bilateral evaluations of professional basketballers. These nonsignificant differences could be related to the necessity to maintain similar strength of two legs.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.28.1.60-71
dc.identifier.doi10.52165/kinsi.28.1.60-71
dc.identifier.eissn2232-4062
dc.identifier.endpage71
dc.identifier.issn1318-2269
dc.identifier.openairedoi_________::34f3cbe11913579c0cc12ff948dea86e
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211574770
dc.identifier.startpage60
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/39708
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Ljubljana
dc.relation.ispartofKinesiologia Slovenica
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF DOMINANT AND NONDOMINANT LEG STRENGTH AND HAMSTRING: QUADRICEPS RATIO IN PROFESSIONAL BASKETBALL PLAYERS
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Zübeyde Aslankeser","name":"Zübeyde","surname":"Aslankeser","rank":1,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Bayram Ceylan","name":"Bayram","surname":"Ceylan","rank":2,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Serkan Revan","name":"Serkan","surname":"Revan","rank":3,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":null,"mainTitle":"COMPARISON OF DOMINANT AND NONDOMINANT LEG STRENGTH AND HAMSTRING: QUADRICEPS RATIO IN PROFESSIONAL BASKETBALL PLAYERS","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p>The literature has revealed that knee injuries are the most common injury among basketball players. The strength ratios dominant/non-dominant and posterior-anterior around the knee joint are used to evaluate strength balances. But there has been far less research published about strength evaluation in professional-level basketball. The objectives of the present study were: (i) to compare hamstring and quadriceps muscles’ strength values during concentric knee extension and flexion at different angular velocities at professional level basketballers, (ii) to determine dominant and non-dominant strength values during these contractions. 13 professional male basketball athletes voluntarily participated in the study. The leg strength was evaluated with an isokinetic dynamometer at 240- 180-120-600 /s angular velocities. The hamstring and quadriceps unilateral peak torque ratio (H/Q) and dominant non-dominant strength ratio were calculated. The independent t-test was computed to bilateral and unilateral strength outputs. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant and non-dominant strength values at peak torque, normalized peak torque, and H/Q at all angular velocities. Relative peak torque outputs in both legs were similar at all angular velocities. Also, the H/Q was calculated as ≥0.60 in all velocities. The results of this study suggest there were not any significant differences in the unilateral and bilateral evaluations of professional basketballers. These nonsignificant differences could be related to the necessity to maintain similar strength of two legs.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publisher":"University of Ljubljana","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","issnPrinted":"1318-2269","issnOnline":"2232-4062","issnLinking":null,"ep":"71","iss":null,"sp":"60","vol":"28","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_________::34f3cbe11913579c0cc12ff948dea86e","originalIds":["10.52165/kinsi.28.1.60-71","50|doiboost____|34f3cbe11913579c0cc12ff948dea86e"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.52165/kinsi.28.1.60-71"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":1,"influence":2.5900306e-9,"popularity":2.6260696e-9,"impulse":1,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.52165/kinsi.28.1.60-71"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.28.1.60-71"],"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","refereed":"peerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar