Yayın:
Pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin in rainbow trout after different routes of administration

dc.contributor.authorTerzi E.
dc.contributor.authorCorum O.
dc.contributor.authorBilen S.
dc.contributor.authorKenanoglu O.N.
dc.contributor.authorAtik O.
dc.contributor.authorUney K.
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T14:03:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-01
dc.description.abstractAbstract The pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin was studied in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after single administration by intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and oral (OR) gavage at a dose of 10 mg/kg and by 10 mg/L bath for 2 h at 11.7 ± 0.8 °C. Furthermore, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of danofloxacin against a pathogenic strain of Yersinia ruckeri, Pseudomonas spp., and Aeromonas hydrophila were determined. Plasma concentrations of danofloxacin were determined using high-performance liquid chromatograph - UV and further subjected to noncompartmental analysis. Elimination half-lives for IV, IM, OR and bath administration were 25.97 h, 42.43 h, 41.04 h and 40.41 h, respectively. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) for IM, OR and bath administration were 3.64 ± 0.12, 2.93 ± 0.23, and 0.36 ± 0.02 μg/mL, respectively. Bioavailability was 105.87% (IM), 96.92% (OR) and 10.09% (bath). MIC values were 0.02 μg/mL for Y. ruckeri, 3.2 μg/mL for Pseudomonas spp., and 8 μg/mL for A. hydrophila at 12 °C. Danofloxacin provides the desired AUC0–24/MIC (≥125) and Cmax/MIC (≥10) values for Y. ruckeri following administration at a dose of 10 mg/kg (L) from all routes administration, whereas inadequate for Pseudomonas spp. and A. hydrophila. This information may help in the use of danofloxacin in rainbow trout, but increasing doses pharmacokinetics with the residue depletion study and clinical studies in infected fish are needed.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984
dc.description.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/38691
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984
dc.identifier.issn0044-8486
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::2992c1c0589173d15ca5de29f191068c
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2811-6497
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3168-2510
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2411-7492
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8674-4873
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078111649
dc.identifier.startpage734984
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/37909
dc.identifier.volume520
dc.identifier.wos000515498200075
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofAquaculture
dc.rightsCLOSED
dc.subjectRainbow trout
dc.subjectPharmacodynamics
dc.subjectPharmacokinetics
dc.subjectDanofloxacin
dc.subject.sdg6. Clean water
dc.subject.sdg3. Good health
dc.titlePharmacokinetics of danofloxacin in rainbow trout after different routes of administration
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Terzi E.","name":null,"surname":null,"rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-2811-6497"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Corum O.","name":null,"surname":null,"rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-3168-2510"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Bilen S.","name":null,"surname":null,"rank":3,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Kenanoglu O.N.","name":null,"surname":null,"rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Atik O.","name":null,"surname":null,"rank":5,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-2411-7492"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Uney K.","name":null,"surname":null,"rank":6,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-8674-4873"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0301 basic medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0403 veterinary science"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"03 medical and health sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Rainbow trout"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Pharmacodynamics"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Pharmacokinetics"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"04 agricultural and veterinary sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Danofloxacin"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"6. Clean water"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"3. Good health"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin in rainbow trout after different routes of administration","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["Abstract The pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin was studied in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after single administration by intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and oral (OR) gavage at a dose of 10 mg/kg and by 10 mg/L bath for 2 h at 11.7 ± 0.8 °C. Furthermore, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of danofloxacin against a pathogenic strain of Yersinia ruckeri, Pseudomonas spp., and Aeromonas hydrophila were determined. Plasma concentrations of danofloxacin were determined using high-performance liquid chromatograph - UV and further subjected to noncompartmental analysis. Elimination half-lives for IV, IM, OR and bath administration were 25.97 h, 42.43 h, 41.04 h and 40.41 h, respectively. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) for IM, OR and bath administration were 3.64 ± 0.12, 2.93 ± 0.23, and 0.36 ± 0.02 μg/mL, respectively. Bioavailability was 105.87% (IM), 96.92% (OR) and 10.09% (bath). MIC values were 0.02 μg/mL for Y. ruckeri, 3.2 μg/mL for Pseudomonas spp., and 8 μg/mL for A. hydrophila at 12 °C. Danofloxacin provides the desired AUC0–24/MIC (≥125) and Cmax/MIC (≥10) values for Y. ruckeri following administration at a dose of 10 mg/kg (L) from all routes administration, whereas inadequate for Pseudomonas spp. and A. hydrophila. This information may help in the use of danofloxacin in rainbow trout, but increasing doses pharmacokinetics with the residue depletion study and clinical studies in infected fish are needed."],"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publisher":"Elsevier BV","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":["Selcuk University Institutional Repository"],"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Aquaculture","issnPrinted":"0044-8486","issnOnline":null,"issnLinking":null,"ep":null,"iss":null,"sp":"734984","vol":"520","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::2992c1c0589173d15ca5de29f191068c","originalIds":["S0044848619316333","10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984","50|doiboost____|2992c1c0589173d15ca5de29f191068c","3000066080","oai:acikerisim.selcuk.edu.tr:20.500.12395/38691","50|od______4883::1fcb94582f2a314956e4a6ac564fc286"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984"},{"scheme":"handle","value":"20.500.12395/38691"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":36,"influence":3.9600807e-9,"popularity":2.8373123e-8,"impulse":27,"citationClass":"C4","influenceClass":"C4","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984"}],"license":"Elsevier TDM","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984"],"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3000066080"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"20.500.12395/38691"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734984","https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/38691"],"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar