Yayın:
From Individual Freedom to Social Order: The Religion Question in Social Theory

Basit Görünüm
dc.contributor.authorKUTLU, Aydoğan
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T13:54:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-31
dc.description.abstractThis study deals with the question of religion, which constitutes a basic discussion of political and social theory with the birth of the modern state. The autonomization of politics from religion, with various scientific developments has led to the secularization of other scopes of society and the public functions of religion have become increasingly debatable. Two moments and their synthesis can be mentioned here. After the French Revolution, the Enlightenment's critical debate on an individual basis turned into a supportive debate focusing on the social function of religion. A critical synthesis of these individual and social approaches was developed by Marx and the inadequacy of considering religion as a purely epistemological problem was ignored.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009
dc.description.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/946297
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009
dc.description.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fsecon/issue/52125/663854
dc.identifier.doi10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009
dc.identifier.eissn2564-7504
dc.identifier.endpage190
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::e8a5657cd93d22dfce78e6db059f480d
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8462-2610
dc.identifier.startpage175
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/37810
dc.identifier.volume4
dc.publisherFiscaoeconomia
dc.relation.ispartofFiscaoeconomia
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectReligion-Politics Relationship
dc.subjectSocial Theory
dc.subjectEnlightenment
dc.subjectEmancipation
dc.titleFrom Individual Freedom to Social Order: The Religion Question in Social Theory
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Aydoğan KUTLU","name":"Aydoğan","surname":"KUTLU","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0002-8462-2610"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Religion-Politics Relationship;Social Theory;Enlightenment;Emancipation"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0502 economics and business"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"05 social sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0506 political science"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"From Individual Freedom to Social Order: The Religion Question in Social Theory","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">This study deals with the question of religion, which constitutes a basic discussion of political and social theory with the birth of the modern state. The autonomization of politics from religion, with various scientific developments has led to the secularization of other scopes of society and the public functions of religion have become increasingly debatable. Two moments and their synthesis can be mentioned here. After the French Revolution, the Enlightenment's critical debate on an individual basis turned into a supportive debate focusing on the social function of religion. A critical synthesis of these individual and social approaches was developed by Marx and the inadequacy of considering religion as a purely epistemological problem was ignored.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publisher":"Fiscaoeconomia","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Volume: 4, Issue: 1 175-190","2564-7504","Fiscaoeconomia"],"formats":["application/pdf"],"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Fiscaoeconomia","issnPrinted":null,"issnOnline":"2564-7504","issnLinking":null,"ep":"190","iss":null,"sp":"175","vol":"4","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::e8a5657cd93d22dfce78e6db059f480d","originalIds":["10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009","50|doiboost____|e8a5657cd93d22dfce78e6db059f480d","3003213277","50|tubitakulakb::a560d3653b2d2ed684e3c79983a76d33","oai:dergipark.org.tr:article/663854"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":0,"influence":2.5349236e-9,"popularity":1.4049963e-9,"impulse":0,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009"],"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009"}],"license":"CC BY NC ND","type":"Article","urls":["https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/946297"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3003213277"}],"type":"Other literature type","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fsecon/issue/52125/663854"],"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar

Publications