Yayın:
Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tolfenamic acid in sheep

dc.contributor.authorCorum, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorCorum, Duygu Durna
dc.contributor.authorEr, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorUney, Kamil
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T12:16:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-07
dc.description.abstractAbstractThe pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and tolerability of tolfenamic acid (TA) were determined after treating sheep withTAvia different routes and doses. This crossover study was carried out with a washout period of 15 days. In the study, 16 clinically healthy sheep were randomly assigned to two equal groups. In the first group (n = 8), animals receivedTAby intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or oral (OR) routes at 2 mg/kg. In the second group (n = 8),TAwas administered intravenously to each sheep at 2, 4, 8, and 16 mg/kg. Plasma samples were analyzed with a high‐performance liquid chromatography assay. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analyses were used to evaluate the data. The area under the concentration–time curves (AUC0−∞), elimination half‐life (t1/2ʎz), and the mean residence time (MRT) significantly differed among the administration routes at 2 mg/kg ofTA. FollowingIM,SC, andORadministrations,TAdemonstrated different peak concentrations (Cmax) and time to reachCmax(Tmax), with a bioavailability of 163%, 127%, and 107%, respectively. The dose‐normalizedAUC0−∞revealed a significant difference among the dose groups; however, the relationship between dose andAUC0−∞was linear. Botht1/2ʎzandMRTincreased depending on the dose. Although the total clearance (ClT) decreased depending on dose, the volume of distribution at steady‐state (Vss) increased. Tolfenamic acid indicated a long half‐life and high bioavailability followingIM,SC, andORadministrations at 2 mg/kg.TAexhibited linear kinetics and was well tolerated by the animals, except at 16 mg/kg. Thus,TAmay be used in different routes and doses (≤8 mg/kg) in sheep; however, further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficacy ofTAduring the inflammatory and painful conditions and the pharmacokinetics and safety of repeated administration in sheep.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12702
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30084126
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12702
dc.description.urihttps://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/29321
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jvp.12702
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2885
dc.identifier.endpage877
dc.identifier.issn0140-7783
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::02c001346c070f17dc5b0cea6f1aa7a5
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3168-2510
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1567-991x
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8674-4873
dc.identifier.pubmed30084126
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85052510285
dc.identifier.startpage871
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/36934
dc.identifier.volume41
dc.identifier.wos000451777000011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectAnalgesics
dc.subjectCross-Over Studies
dc.subjectSheep
dc.subjectDose-Response Relationship, Drug
dc.subjectDrug Administration Routes
dc.subjectBiological Availability
dc.subjectRandom Allocation
dc.subjectArea Under Curve
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectortho-Aminobenzoates
dc.subjectHalf-Life
dc.subject.sdg2. Zero hunger
dc.titlePharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tolfenamic acid in sheep
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Orhan Corum","name":"Orhan","surname":"Corum","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-3168-2510"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Duygu Durna Corum","name":"Duygu Durna","surname":"Corum","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0003-1567-991x"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Ayse Er","name":"Ayse","surname":"Er","rank":3,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Ramazan Yildiz","name":"Ramazan","surname":"Yildiz","rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Kamil Uney","name":"Kamil","surname":"Uney","rank":5,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-8674-4873"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"2. Zero hunger"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Analgesics"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Cross-Over Studies"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Sheep"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Dose-Response Relationship, Drug"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Drug Administration Routes"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0402 animal and dairy science"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Biological Availability"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"04 agricultural and veterinary sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0403 veterinary science"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Random Allocation"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Area Under Curve"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Animals"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"ortho-Aminobenzoates"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Half-Life"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tolfenamic acid in sheep","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and tolerability of tolfenamic acid (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>) were determined after treating sheep with<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>via different routes and doses. This crossover study was carried out with a washout period of 15 days. In the study, 16 clinically healthy sheep were randomly assigned to two equal groups. In the first group (<jats:italic>n </jats:italic>=<jats:italic> </jats:italic>8), animals received<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>by intravenous (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IV</jats:styled-content>), intramuscular (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IM</jats:styled-content>), subcutaneous (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SC</jats:styled-content>), or oral (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>) routes at 2 mg/kg. In the second group (<jats:italic>n </jats:italic>=<jats:italic> </jats:italic>8),<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>was administered intravenously to each sheep at 2, 4, 8, and 16 mg/kg. Plasma samples were analyzed with a high‐performance liquid chromatography assay. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analyses were used to evaluate the data. The area under the concentration–time curves (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">AUC</jats:styled-content><jats:sub>0−∞</jats:sub>), elimination half‐life (<jats:italic>t</jats:italic><jats:sub>1/2ʎz</jats:sub>), and the mean residence time (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MRT</jats:styled-content>) significantly differed among the administration routes at 2 mg/kg of<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>. Following<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IM</jats:styled-content>,<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SC</jats:styled-content>, and<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>administrations,<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>demonstrated different peak concentrations (<jats:italic>C</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub>) and time to reach<jats:italic>C</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub>(<jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>max</jats:sub>), with a bioavailability of 163%, 127%, and 107%, respectively. The dose‐normalized<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">AUC</jats:styled-content><jats:sub>0−∞</jats:sub>revealed a significant difference among the dose groups; however, the relationship between dose and<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">AUC</jats:styled-content><jats:sub>0−∞</jats:sub>was linear. Both<jats:italic>t</jats:italic><jats:sub>1/2ʎz</jats:sub>and<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MRT</jats:styled-content>increased depending on the dose. Although the total clearance (Cl<jats:sub>T</jats:sub>) decreased depending on dose, the volume of distribution at steady‐state (<jats:italic>V</jats:italic><jats:sub>ss</jats:sub>) increased. Tolfenamic acid indicated a long half‐life and high bioavailability following<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IM</jats:styled-content>,<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SC</jats:styled-content>, and<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>administrations at 2 mg/kg.<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>exhibited linear kinetics and was well tolerated by the animals, except at 16 mg/kg. Thus,<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>may be used in different routes and doses (≤8 mg/kg) in sheep; however, further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TA</jats:styled-content>during the inflammatory and painful conditions and the pharmacokinetics and safety of repeated administration in sheep.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2018-08-07","publisher":"Wiley","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics","issnPrinted":"0140-7783","issnOnline":"1365-2885","issnLinking":null,"ep":"877","iss":null,"sp":"871","vol":"41","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::02c001346c070f17dc5b0cea6f1aa7a5","originalIds":["10.1111/jvp.12702","50|doiboost____|02c001346c070f17dc5b0cea6f1aa7a5","30084126","2886590412","50|r39c86a4b39b::9af0e9954af58acbad3ffe80bcafeba2","oai:zenodo.org:29321"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12702"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"30084126"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":28,"influence":3.8429278e-9,"popularity":1.7527599e-8,"impulse":13,"citationClass":"C4","influenceClass":"C4","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12702"}],"license":"Wiley Online Library User Agreement","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12702"],"publicationDate":"2018-08-07","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"30084126"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12702"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30084126"],"publicationDate":"2019-01-14","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12702"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"2886590412"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12702"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"license":"CC BY","type":"Other literature type","urls":["https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/29321"],"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":true,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atPubMed

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar