Yayın: Type 2 dynamic curves: A diagnostic dilemma
| dc.contributor.author | Karavas, Erdal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ece, Bunyamin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aydın, Sonay | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-04T17:05:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-07-28 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with multiparametric dynamic contrast plays a critical role in the assessment of breast lesions. Dynamic curves are a critical parameter in determining the benign or malignant nature of lesions. Dynamic curves of type 1 are known to represent benign masses, while dynamic curves of type 3 are known to identify malignant masses. Type 2 dynamic curves have a sensitivity of 42.6% and specificity of 75% for malignancy detection.To investigate the pathological diagnosis of lesions with type 2 dynamic curves.We evaluated breast MRI examinations performed between 2020 and 2021 retrospectively and included lesions with type 2 dynamic curves. We included 38 lesions from 33 patients. The lesions were evaluated for their pathological diagnosis and morphological characteristics.Twenty-six lesions were malignant, while twelve were benign. The most frequently encountered benign lesion (7/12, 58.3%) was sclerosing adenosis, while the most frequently encountered malignant diagnosis was invasive ductal cancer. The presence of a type 2 dynamic curve had a sensitivity of 40.2% and specificity of 73.4% for predicting malignancy. By combining type 2 curves and morphological features, the sensitivity and specificity were increased.The high rates of malignancy detected histopathologically among patients with type 2 dynamic curves in our study are remarkable. Type 2 dynamic curves can be detected in benign breast masses, especially in sclerosing adenosis cases. Considering morphological features can increase the diagnostic accuracy in cases with type 2 dynamic curves. | |
| dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v14.i7.229 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36160627 | |
| dc.description.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v14.i7.229 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4329/wjr.v14.i7.229 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 237 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1949-8470 | |
| dc.identifier.openaire | doi_dedup___::3968cbf4fc7e1d89ed7aad85fbe680e0 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-6649-3256 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-6288-8410 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 36160627 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 229 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/39883 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 14 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 000837255000005 | |
| dc.publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | World Journal of Radiology | |
| dc.rights | OPEN | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective Study | |
| dc.subject.sdg | 3. Good health | |
| dc.title | Type 2 dynamic curves: A diagnostic dilemma | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.import.source | OpenAire | |
| local.indexed.at | WOS | |
| local.indexed.at | PubMed |
