Yayın:
Colon Disease Diagnosis with Convolutional Neural Network and Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm

dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Amna Ali A.
dc.contributor.authorHançerlioğullari, Aybaba
dc.contributor.authorRahebi, Javad
dc.contributor.authorRay, Mayukh K.
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Sudipta
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T18:43:43Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-12
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a robust colon cancer diagnosis method based on the feature selection method. The proposed method for colon disease diagnosis can be divided into three steps. In the first step, the images’ features were extracted based on the convolutional neural network. Squeezenet, Resnet-50, AlexNet, and GoogleNet were used for the convolutional neural network. The extracted features are huge, and the number of features cannot be appropriate for training the system. For this reason, the metaheuristic method is used in the second step to reduce the number of features. This research uses the grasshopper optimization algorithm to select the best features from the feature data. Finally, using machine learning methods, colon disease diagnosis was found to be accurate and successful. Two classification methods are applied for the evaluation of the proposed method. These methods include the decision tree and the support vector machine. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1Score have been used to evaluate the proposed method. For Squeezenet based on the support vector machine, we obtained results of 99.34%, 99.41%, 99.12%, 98.91% and 98.94% for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and F1Score, respectively. In the end, we compared the suggested recognition method’s performance to the performances of other methods, including 9-layer CNN, random forest, 7-layer CNN, and DropBlock. We demonstrated that our solution outperformed the others.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101728
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37238212
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101728
dc.description.urihttps://doaj.org/article/8a405ad7a3f74c528a059351b4bdb3b1
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101728
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics13101728
dc.identifier.eissn2075-4418
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::dc494dbf9093dfe2b791d8cd0fa5329b
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8344-6937
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9875-4860
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5161-9311
dc.identifier.pubmed37238212
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85160523937
dc.identifier.startpage1728
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/40727
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wos000998200500001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnostics
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectMedicine (General)
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectR5-920
dc.subjectcolon disease diagnose
dc.subjectcolon disease diagnose
dc.subjectconvolutional neural network
dc.subjectgrasshopper optimization algorithm
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectconvolutional neural network
dc.subjectgrasshopper optimization algorithm
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subject.sdg3. Good health
dc.titleColon Disease Diagnosis with Convolutional Neural Network and Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Amna Ali A. Mohamed","name":"Amna Ali A.","surname":"Mohamed","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0001-8344-6937"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Aybaba Hançerlioğullari","name":"Aybaba","surname":"Hançerlioğullari","rank":2,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Javad Rahebi","name":"Javad","surname":"Rahebi","rank":3,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0001-9875-4860"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Mayukh K. Ray","name":"Mayukh K.","surname":"Ray","rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Sudipta Roy","name":"Sudipta","surname":"Roy","rank":5,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0001-5161-9311"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Medicine (General)"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"machine learning"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"R5-920"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"colon disease diagnose"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"colon disease diagnose; convolutional neural network; grasshopper optimization algorithm; machine learning"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"convolutional neural network"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"grasshopper optimization algorithm"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Article"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"3. Good health"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Colon Disease Diagnosis with Convolutional Neural Network and Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p>This paper presents a robust colon cancer diagnosis method based on the feature selection method. The proposed method for colon disease diagnosis can be divided into three steps. In the first step, the images’ features were extracted based on the convolutional neural network. Squeezenet, Resnet-50, AlexNet, and GoogleNet were used for the convolutional neural network. The extracted features are huge, and the number of features cannot be appropriate for training the system. For this reason, the metaheuristic method is used in the second step to reduce the number of features. This research uses the grasshopper optimization algorithm to select the best features from the feature data. Finally, using machine learning methods, colon disease diagnosis was found to be accurate and successful. Two classification methods are applied for the evaluation of the proposed method. These methods include the decision tree and the support vector machine. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1Score have been used to evaluate the proposed method. For Squeezenet based on the support vector machine, we obtained results of 99.34%, 99.41%, 99.12%, 98.91% and 98.94% for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and F1Score, respectively. In the end, we compared the suggested recognition method’s performance to the performances of other methods, including 9-layer CNN, random forest, 7-layer CNN, and DropBlock. We demonstrated that our solution outperformed the others.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publisher":"MDPI AG","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Diagnostics (Basel)","Diagnostics, Vol 13, Iss 10, p 1728 (2023)","Diagnostics; Volume 13; Issue 10; Pages: 1728"],"formats":["application/pdf"],"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Diagnostics","issnPrinted":null,"issnOnline":"2075-4418","issnLinking":null,"ep":null,"iss":null,"sp":"1728","vol":"13","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::dc494dbf9093dfe2b791d8cd0fa5329b","originalIds":["diagnostics13101728","10.3390/diagnostics13101728","50|doiboost____|dc494dbf9093dfe2b791d8cd0fa5329b","od_______267::eb13f44ffdfdce2ef1935239629f342e","37238212","PMC10217543","oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10217543","50|od_______267::eb13f44ffdfdce2ef1935239629f342e","oai:doaj.org/article:8a405ad7a3f74c528a059351b4bdb3b1","50|doajarticles::fe1da8ef0496546c02f2e39f2d80ddf6","oai:mdpi.com:/2075-4418/13/10/1728/","50|multidiscipl::4bfd26b6bab50249e40047c1d0ea1145"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/diagnostics13101728"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"37238212"},{"scheme":"pmc","value":"PMC10217543"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":21,"influence":3.7453347e-9,"popularity":1.90841e-8,"impulse":21,"citationClass":"C4","influenceClass":"C4","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/diagnostics13101728"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101728"],"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"37238212"},{"scheme":"pmc","value":"PMC10217543"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/diagnostics13101728"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37238212"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/diagnostics13101728"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Other literature type","urls":["http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101728"],"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/diagnostics13101728"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doaj.org/article/8a405ad7a3f74c528a059351b4bdb3b1"],"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.3390/diagnostics13101728"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Other literature type","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101728"],"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":true,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atPubMed

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar