Yayın:
Consensus on the Competencies for a Classroom Teacher to Support Gifted Students in the Regular Classroom: A Delphi Study

dc.contributor.authorAkar, İbrahim
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T13:56:37Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-09
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research was to seek and reach a consensus on the competencies for classroom teachers to support gifted students in the regular classrooms. The Delphi Technique was used to achieve this purpose. The panel was carried out in three following rounds. Participants of the panel were thirty-six panelists including fifteen academicians holding PhD degrees and actively teaching in special or elementary education departments, and twenty-one in-service classroom teachers. Three sequential Delphi questionnaires that were included competencies in which panelists were asked to evaluate each competency on a seven point likert scale used during the panel. Calculated reliability coefficients of these questionnaires were .97, .93 and .94, respectively. One more competency was added after the analysis of first Delphi questionnaire. The three-round Delphi panel has showed that there was a consensus among experts on all thirty-five competencies. Competencies were discussed with regard to previous research and a number of suggestions for future research and implementation were developed.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6
dc.identifier.doi10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6
dc.identifier.endpage83
dc.identifier.issn1554-5210
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::9e56ebc95767436ef26d4f0a086b1f66
dc.identifier.startpage67
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/37834
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.publisherPen Academic Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Progressive Education
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subject.sdg4. Education
dc.titleConsensus on the Competencies for a Classroom Teacher to Support Gifted Students in the Regular Classroom: A Delphi Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"İbrahim Akar","name":"İbrahim","surname":"Akar","rank":1,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"4. Education"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"05 social sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0503 education"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Consensus on the Competencies for a Classroom Teacher to Support Gifted Students in the Regular Classroom: A Delphi Study","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["The purpose of this research was to seek and reach a consensus on the competencies for classroom teachers to support gifted students in the regular classrooms. The Delphi Technique was used to achieve this purpose. The panel was carried out in three following rounds. Participants of the panel were thirty-six panelists including fifteen academicians holding PhD degrees and actively teaching in special or elementary education departments, and twenty-one in-service classroom teachers. Three sequential Delphi questionnaires that were included competencies in which panelists were asked to evaluate each competency on a seven point likert scale used during the panel. Calculated reliability coefficients of these questionnaires were .97, .93 and .94, respectively. One more competency was added after the analysis of first Delphi questionnaire. The three-round Delphi panel has showed that there was a consensus among experts on all thirty-five competencies. Competencies were discussed with regard to previous research and a number of suggestions for future research and implementation were developed."],"publicationDate":"2020-02-09","publisher":"Pen Academic Publishing","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"International Journal of Progressive Education","issnPrinted":"1554-5210","issnOnline":null,"issnLinking":null,"ep":"83","iss":null,"sp":"67","vol":"16","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::9e56ebc95767436ef26d4f0a086b1f66","originalIds":["10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6","50|doiboost____|9e56ebc95767436ef26d4f0a086b1f66","3008717087"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":9,"influence":2.8975213e-9,"popularity":7.622091e-9,"impulse":5,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6"],"publicationDate":"2020-02-09","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3008717087"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar