Yayın:
Effect of supportive therapy on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous marbofloxacin in endotoxemic sheep

dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Devran
dc.contributor.authorCorum, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorYazar, Enver
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T13:59:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-04
dc.description.abstractAbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the influences of supportive therapy (ST) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of marbofloxacin in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced endotoxemic sheep. Furthermore, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of marbofloxacin against Escherichia coli, Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus was determined. The study was performed using a three‐period cross PK design following a 15‐day washout period. In the first period, marbofloxacin (10 mg/kg) was administered by an intravenous (IV) injection. In the second and third periods, marbofloxacin was co‐administered with ST (lactated ringer + 5% dextrose + 0.45% sodium chloride, IV, 20 ml/kg, dexamethasone 0.5 mg/kg, SC) and ST + LPS (E. coli O55:B5, 10 µg/kg), respectively. Plasma marbofloxacin concentration was measured using HPLC‐UV. Following IV administration of marbofloxacin alone, the , AUC0–∞, ClT, and Vdss were 2.87 hr, 34.73 hr × µg/ml, 0.29 L hr−1 kg−1, and 0.87 L/kg, respectively. While no change was found in the MBX + ST group in terms of the PK parameters of marbofloxacin, it was determined that the ClT of marbofloxacin decreased, AUC0–∞ increased, and and MRT prolonged in the MBX + ST + LPS group. MIC values of marbofloxacin were 0.031 to >16 µg/ml for E. coli, 0.016 to >16 µg/ml for M. haemolytica, 0.016–1 µg/ml for P. multocida, 0.016–0.25 µg/ml for K. pneumoniae, 0.031–0.063 µg/ml for Salmonella spp., and 0.031–1 µg/ml for S. aureus. The study results show the necessity to make a dose adjustment of marbofloxacin following concomitant administration of ST in endotoxemic sheep. Also, the PK and pharmacodynamic effect of marbofloxacin needs to be determined in naturally infected septicemic sheep following concomitant administration of single and ST.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12849
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32133667
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12849
dc.description.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/7145
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jvp.12849
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2885
dc.identifier.endpage296
dc.identifier.issn0140-7783
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::ee2a17529feef413b6277335ba1c05de
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1151-1861
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3168-2510
dc.identifier.pubmed32133667
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85082310044
dc.identifier.startpage288
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/37864
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.wos000528051100005
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
dc.rightsCLOSED
dc.subjectsheep
dc.subjectCross-Over Studies
dc.subjectSheep
dc.subjectendotoxemia
dc.subjectsupportive therapy
dc.subjectSheep Diseases
dc.subjectEndotoxemia
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents
dc.subjectArea Under Curve
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectmarbofloxacin
dc.subjectpharmacokinetics
dc.subjectFluoroquinolones
dc.subjectHalf-Life
dc.subject.sdg3. Good health
dc.titleEffect of supportive therapy on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous marbofloxacin in endotoxemic sheep
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Devran Coskun","name":"Devran","surname":"Coskun","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-1151-1861"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Orhan Corum","name":"Orhan","surname":"Corum","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-3168-2510"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Enver Yazar","name":"Enver","surname":"Yazar","rank":3,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0301 basic medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"sheep"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Cross-Over Studies"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Sheep"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"endotoxemia"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"supportive therapy"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Sheep Diseases"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"04 agricultural and veterinary sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Endotoxemia"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Anti-Bacterial Agents"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"3. Good health"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0403 veterinary science"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"03 medical and health sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Area Under Curve"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Animals"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"marbofloxacin"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"pharmacokinetics"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Fluoroquinolones"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Half-Life"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Effect of supportive therapy on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous marbofloxacin in endotoxemic sheep","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to determine the influences of supportive therapy (ST) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of marbofloxacin in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced endotoxemic sheep. Furthermore, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of marbofloxacin against <jats:italic>Escherichia coli</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Mannheimia haemolytica</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Pasteurella multocida</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Salmonella</jats:italic> spp., and <jats:italic>Staphylococcus aureus</jats:italic> was determined. The study was performed using a three‐period cross PK design following a 15‐day washout period. In the first period, marbofloxacin (10 mg/kg) was administered by an intravenous (IV) injection. In the second and third periods, marbofloxacin was co‐administered with ST (lactated ringer + 5% dextrose + 0.45% sodium chloride, IV, 20 ml/kg, dexamethasone 0.5 mg/kg, SC) and ST + LPS (<jats:italic>E. coli</jats:italic> O55:B5, 10 µg/kg), respectively. Plasma marbofloxacin concentration was measured using HPLC‐UV. Following IV administration of marbofloxacin alone, the <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"graphic/jvp12849-math-0001.png\" xlink:title=\"urn:x-wiley:01407783:media:jvp12849:jvp12849-math-0001\"/>, AUC<jats:sub>0–∞</jats:sub>, Cl<jats:sub>T</jats:sub>, and <jats:italic>V</jats:italic><jats:sub>dss</jats:sub> were 2.87 hr, 34.73 hr × µg/ml, 0.29 L hr<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and 0.87 L/kg, respectively. While no change was found in the MBX + ST group in terms of the PK parameters of marbofloxacin, it was determined that the Cl<jats:sub>T</jats:sub> of marbofloxacin decreased, AUC<jats:sub>0–∞</jats:sub> increased, and <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"graphic/jvp12849-math-0002.png\" xlink:title=\"urn:x-wiley:01407783:media:jvp12849:jvp12849-math-0002\"/> and MRT prolonged in the MBX + ST + LPS group. MIC values of marbofloxacin were 0.031 to &gt;16 µg/ml for <jats:italic>E. coli</jats:italic>, 0.016 to &gt;16 µg/ml for <jats:italic>M. haemolytica</jats:italic>, 0.016–1 µg/ml for <jats:italic>P. multocida</jats:italic>, 0.016–0.25 µg/ml for <jats:italic>K. pneumoniae</jats:italic>, 0.031–0.063 µg/ml for <jats:italic>Salmonella</jats:italic> spp., and 0.031–1 µg/ml for <jats:italic>S. aureus</jats:italic>. The study results show the necessity to make a dose adjustment of marbofloxacin following concomitant administration of ST in endotoxemic sheep. Also, the PK and pharmacodynamic effect of marbofloxacin needs to be determined in naturally infected septicemic sheep following concomitant administration of single and ST.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publisher":"Wiley","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics","issnPrinted":"0140-7783","issnOnline":"1365-2885","issnLinking":null,"ep":"296","iss":null,"sp":"288","vol":"43","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::ee2a17529feef413b6277335ba1c05de","originalIds":["10.1111/jvp.12849","50|doiboost____|ee2a17529feef413b6277335ba1c05de","32133667","3010212436","oai:acikerisim.siirt.edu.tr:20.500.12604/7145","50|od______9478::f019b4b2e979bfc967635e92c80025d1"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12849"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"32133667"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":10,"influence":2.9410447e-9,"popularity":9.161508e-9,"impulse":6,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12849"}],"license":"Wiley Online Library User Agreement","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12849"],"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"32133667"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12849"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32133667"],"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12849"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3010212436"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12849"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1111/jvp.12849"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/7145"],"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atPubMed

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar