Yayın:
Is thermography the most effective tool to monitor arthritis in rats?

Basit Görünüm
dc.contributor.authorDOĞAN, Elif
dc.contributor.authorSEZER, Azizcan
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T16:07:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-30
dc.description.abstractIn this study, it was aimed to compare the effect of clinical, radiological, and thermographic methods on the diagnosis and prognosis in experimentally rats with arthritis. A total of 24 rats were divided into 2 groups, each consisting of 12 rats. Arthritis was formed by administering 0,1 ml of FCA solution to the left-back extremities of the rats. The first group was called the control group. Cephalexin (60 mg/kg) and Diclofenac Sodium (1mg/kg) were applied to the second group to be the treatment group. From day 1 of the experiment, clinical evaluation and live weight measurements were performed every day. On the 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days of the experiment, paw edema, radiographic, thermographic measurements were performed. While typical arthritis clinical findings obtain after FCA administration, no statistically significant difference was found when analyzing the changes of live weight measurements and paw edema measurements according to groups and time. The difference in the mean of the thermographic measurements of the arthritis-forming claws was statistically significant. Radiographically, degenerations in the joints and bones were found in the control group compared to the more in the treatment group. As a result, it was concluded that thermography can be a good alternative to clinical findings and radiography in the follow-up of arthritis.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101
dc.description.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1819042
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101
dc.description.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/http-www-jivs-net/issue/65558/951101
dc.identifier.doi10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101
dc.identifier.endpage122
dc.identifier.issn2602-3490
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::955329ee4cd5b5e02feaf78b31a3aa6e
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3321-8116
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4604-0705
dc.identifier.startpage117
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/39287
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.publisherJournal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectVeterinary Surgery
dc.subjectInflammation of joint
dc.subjectmonitoring
dc.subjectradiography
dc.subjectthermal camera
dc.subjectVeteriner Cerrahi
dc.subject.sdg3. Good health
dc.titleIs thermography the most effective tool to monitor arthritis in rats?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Elif DOĞAN","name":"Elif","surname":"DOĞAN","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0002-3321-8116"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Azizcan SEZER","name":"Azizcan","surname":"SEZER","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0003-4604-0705"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0403 veterinary science"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Veterinary Surgery"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"03 medical and health sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0302 clinical medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Inflammation of joint;monitoring;radiography;thermal camera"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Veteriner Cerrahi"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"04 agricultural and veterinary sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"3. Good health"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Is thermography the most effective tool to monitor arthritis in rats?","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">In this study, it was aimed to compare the effect of clinical, radiological, and thermographic methods on the diagnosis and prognosis in experimentally rats with arthritis. A total of 24 rats were divided into 2 groups, each consisting of 12 rats. Arthritis was formed by administering 0,1 ml of FCA solution to the left-back extremities of the rats. The first group was called the control group. Cephalexin (60 mg/kg) and Diclofenac Sodium (1mg/kg) were applied to the second group to be the treatment group. From day 1 of the experiment, clinical evaluation and live weight measurements were performed every day. On the 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days of the experiment, paw edema, radiographic, thermographic measurements were performed. While typical arthritis clinical findings obtain after FCA administration, no statistically significant difference was found when analyzing the changes of live weight measurements and paw edema measurements according to groups and time. The difference in the mean of the thermographic measurements of the arthritis-forming claws was statistically significant. Radiographically, degenerations in the joints and bones were found in the control group compared to the more in the treatment group. As a result, it was concluded that thermography can be a good alternative to clinical findings and radiography in the follow-up of arthritis.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publisher":"Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Volume: 5, Issue: 3 117-122","2602-3490","Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences"],"formats":["application/pdf"],"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences","issnPrinted":"2602-3490","issnOnline":null,"issnLinking":null,"ep":"122","iss":null,"sp":"117","vol":"5","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::955329ee4cd5b5e02feaf78b31a3aa6e","originalIds":["10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101","50|doiboost____|955329ee4cd5b5e02feaf78b31a3aa6e","3216015487","oai:dergipark.org.tr:article/951101","50|tubitakulakb::fc25e5d1eee71e542192d9f6c347be68"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":0,"influence":2.5349236e-9,"popularity":1.6119823e-9,"impulse":0,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101"],"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Article","urls":["https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1819042"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3216015487"},{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101"}],"type":"Other literature type","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.951101"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/http-www-jivs-net/issue/65558/951101"],"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar

Publications