Yayın:
Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Financing Policies Used by OECD Member Countries and Financing Policy Proposal for Türkiye

dc.contributor.authorÇetinkaya, Reşit
dc.contributor.authorÇavdar, Ertuğrul
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T20:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-29
dc.description.abstractThe Turkish higher education system has developed remarkably in parallel with the developments and changes in the world today. With the ease of access to higher education for students and the increase in the number of students, higher education costs are increasing. This situation puts the higher education system under financial pressure in countries that provide higher education financing from public sources. In this study, higher education financing methods used worldwide are compared and the most appropriate financing method for Türkiye is discussed. For this purpose, the Entropy method was used in weighting the criteria determined for the evaluation of financing policies, and the performance analysis of the alternatives was carried out with the TOPSIS method, which is one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods. Alternative decision options for financing higher education are based on "No Fee", "Pre-charging" and "Income-Contingent Loan-ICL" methods and the main criteria are enrollment, education expenditures and labor force. In this context, sub-criteria were created and the financing methods used by OECD countries were analyzed. Within the scope of the study, it has been determined that the financing methods used by Norway, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in higher education systems are in the top three. In this context, it has been determined that the "Income-Contingent Loan" method used by the first and third ranked countries is the most preferred method in terms of performance.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.53048/johass.1482714
dc.description.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/johass/issue/84739/1482714
dc.identifier.doi10.53048/johass.1482714
dc.identifier.endpage103
dc.identifier.issn2667-4343
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::6312385dd8033f5673ce8db2c3bd561b
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9997-7986
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1522-8775
dc.identifier.startpage73
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/41809
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.publisherBilgicagi Education Consulting and Publishing Industry Trade Limited Company
dc.relation.ispartofİnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectHigher education
dc.subjectfinancing
dc.subjectTOPSIS
dc.subjectICL
dc.subjectOther Fields of Education (Other)
dc.subjectYükseköğretim
dc.subjectFinans
dc.subjectTOPSIS
dc.subjectAlan Eğitimleri (Diğer)
dc.subject.sdg4. Education
dc.subject.sdg1. No poverty
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Higher Education Financing Policies Used by OECD Member Countries and Financing Policy Proposal for Türkiye
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Reşit Çetinkaya","name":"Reşit","surname":"Çetinkaya","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0001-9997-7986"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Ertuğrul Çavdar","name":"Ertuğrul","surname":"Çavdar","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-1522-8775"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"4. Education"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"05 social sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"1. No poverty"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Higher education;financing;TOPSIS;ICL"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"02 engineering and technology"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Other Fields of Education (Other)"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Yükseköğretim;Finans;TOPSIS"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0503 education"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Alan Eğitimleri (Diğer)"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Financing Policies Used by OECD Member Countries and Financing Policy Proposal for Türkiye","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">The Turkish higher education system has developed remarkably in parallel with the developments and changes in the world today. With the ease of access to higher education for students and the increase in the number of students, higher education costs are increasing. This situation puts the higher education system under financial pressure in countries that provide higher education financing from public sources. In this study, higher education financing methods used worldwide are compared and the most appropriate financing method for Türkiye is discussed. For this purpose, the Entropy method was used in weighting the criteria determined for the evaluation of financing policies, and the performance analysis of the alternatives was carried out with the TOPSIS method, which is one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods. Alternative decision options for financing higher education are based on \"No Fee\", \"Pre-charging\" and \"Income-Contingent Loan-ICL\" methods and the main criteria are enrollment, education expenditures and labor force. In this context, sub-criteria were created and the financing methods used by OECD countries were analyzed. Within the scope of the study, it has been determined that the financing methods used by Norway, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in higher education systems are in the top three. In this context, it has been determined that the \"Income-Contingent Loan\" method used by the first and third ranked countries is the most preferred method in terms of performance.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publisher":"Bilgicagi Education Consulting and Publishing Industry Trade Limited Company","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Volume: 7, Issue: 173-103","2667-4343","Journal of Human and Social Sciences","İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi"],"formats":["application/pdf"],"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","issnPrinted":"2667-4343","issnOnline":null,"issnLinking":null,"ep":"103","iss":null,"sp":"73","vol":"7","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::6312385dd8033f5673ce8db2c3bd561b","originalIds":["10.53048/johass.1482714","50|doiboost____|6312385dd8033f5673ce8db2c3bd561b","50|tubitakulakb::7dacc33e48d726aaf30c07d7b06fbfef","oai:dergipark.org.tr:article/1482714"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.53048/johass.1482714"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":0,"influence":2.5349236e-9,"popularity":2.4744335e-9,"impulse":0,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.53048/johass.1482714"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.53048/johass.1482714"],"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.53048/johass.1482714"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/johass/issue/84739/1482714"],"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar