Yayın:
Using macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices and diversity indices to assess water quality: A case study on the Karasu Stream (Kastamonu, Türkiye)

dc.contributor.authorKüçükbasmacı, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorEtriieki, Abdulhamed M. Omar
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T19:20:58Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-21
dc.description.abstractBiomonitoring is an approach that uses indicators or sentinel species to assess the health or pollution of an environment, combining diversity based on specific taxonomic groups with the taxa’s indicator of pollution into a single index or score. Benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most preferred and valuable indicators of the biotic index. Our study aims to evaluate water quality and ecological status using biotic and diversity indices based on benthic macroinvertebrates. The macroinvertebrate samples used in this study were collected seasonally from 16 stations determined in Karasu Stream. These samples consist of 14747 specimens belonging to 9 orders and 40 families of Insecta, Malacostraca, Hirudinea and Oligochaeta. In addition, some physicochemical parameters were measured at the stations. The data obtained were analyzed using the Turkey-Biological Monitoring Working Group (TR-BMWP), Average Score per Taxon (ASPT), Family Biotic Index (FBI), Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) taxon richness index, and Shannon-Wiener (SWDI), Simpson (SDI) and Hill’s diversity indices. Our results showed that the last six stations of Karasu Stream were under pressure due to various anthropogenic effects. According to biotic indexes, the ecological quality status of the water in the stations was determined to be High or Good in the first ten stations and Average, Poor, or Bad in the last six stations. The results of our study showed that TR-BMWP, FBI, and EPT indices are more reliable in determining water quality than the ASPT index and reflect the environmental situation better. Since the TR-BMWP index is adapted to macroinvertebrate taxa distributed in Türkiye, it can be used as a suitable tool for evaluating other rivers’ water quality in Türkiye.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.22541/au.169786984.43894420/v1
dc.identifier.doi10.22541/au.169786984.43894420/v1
dc.identifier.openairedoi_________::afac3c542e1a26b4a371057f84edd1f7
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9780-5002
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5398-7046
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/41136
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subject.sdg13. Climate action
dc.subject.sdg14. Life underwater
dc.subject.sdg15. Life on land
dc.subject.sdg6. Clean water
dc.titleUsing macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices and diversity indices to assess water quality: A case study on the Karasu Stream (Kastamonu, Türkiye)
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"İbrahim Küçükbasmacı","name":"İbrahim","surname":"Küçükbasmacı","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0000-0002-9780-5002"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Abdulhamed M. Omar Etriieki","name":"Abdulhamed M. Omar","surname":"Etriieki","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0001-5398-7046"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"13. Climate action"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"14. Life underwater"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"15. Life on land"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"6. Clean water"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Using macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices and diversity indices to assess water quality: A case study on the Karasu Stream (Kastamonu, Türkiye)","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p id=\"p1\">Biomonitoring is an approach that uses indicators or sentinel species to assess the health or pollution of an environment, combining diversity based on specific taxonomic groups with the taxa’s indicator of pollution into a single index or score. Benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most preferred and valuable indicators of the biotic index. Our study aims to evaluate water quality and ecological status using biotic and diversity indices based on benthic macroinvertebrates. The macroinvertebrate samples used in this study were collected seasonally from 16 stations determined in Karasu Stream. These samples consist of 14747 specimens belonging to 9 orders and 40 families of Insecta, Malacostraca, Hirudinea and Oligochaeta. In addition, some physicochemical parameters were measured at the stations. The data obtained were analyzed using the Turkey-Biological Monitoring Working Group (TR-BMWP), Average Score per Taxon (ASPT), Family Biotic Index (FBI), Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) taxon richness index, and Shannon-Wiener (SWDI), Simpson (SDI) and Hill’s diversity indices. Our results showed that the last six stations of Karasu Stream were under pressure due to various anthropogenic effects. According to biotic indexes, the ecological quality status of the water in the stations was determined to be High or Good in the first ten stations and Average, Poor, or Bad in the last six stations. The results of our study showed that TR-BMWP, FBI, and EPT indices are more reliable in determining water quality than the ASPT index and reflect the environmental situation better. Since the TR-BMWP index is adapted to macroinvertebrate taxa distributed in Türkiye, it can be used as a suitable tool for evaluating other rivers’ water quality in Türkiye.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publisher":"Wiley","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":null,"container":null,"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_________::afac3c542e1a26b4a371057f84edd1f7","originalIds":["10.22541/au.169786984.43894420/v1","50|doiboost____|afac3c542e1a26b4a371057f84edd1f7"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.22541/au.169786984.43894420/v1"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":0,"influence":2.5349236e-9,"popularity":2.1399287e-9,"impulse":0,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.22541/au.169786984.43894420/v1"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.22541/au.169786984.43894420/v1"],"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","refereed":"peerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar