Yayın:
Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions

dc.contributor.authorÇobanoğlu, Kübra
dc.contributor.authorDeğermenci, Nejdet
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T16:38:26Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-28
dc.description.abstractAdvanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are an effective choice for removal of reactive azo dyes used in the textile industry due to high solubility and low degradability. Within the scope of this study, reactive orange 122 (RO122) azo dye was removed using the UV-based AOPs of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, UV/hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2), UV/persulfate (UV/S2O82-), and UV/peroxymonosulfate (UV/HSO5-). Oxidant concentration, initial solution pH, initial RO122 concentration, different anions (Cl-, NO3- and SO42-), and solution temperature effects were compared. With only UV radiation (254 nm), 19.5% RO122 removal occurred at the end of 120 min. The RO122 removal reduced with the UV/oxidant processes at pH 9. Experimental results revealed RO122 removal followed pseudo-first-order (PFO) kinetics. There was a linear correlation identified between initial oxidant concentration and the PFO kinetic rate constant (k1). Among the three UV-based processes, with oxidant concentration 50 mg/L, temperature 20 °C, and pH 5, RO122 removal efficiency was in the order UV/H2O2 > UV/HSO5- > UV/S2O82-. RO122 removal rate increased as initial oxidant concentration and temperature increased and reduced as initial RO122 concentration increased. Energy requirements and oxidant costs were assessed. The UV/H2O2 process was concluded to be the most efficient and economic process for RO122 removal.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35347461
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z
dc.identifier.eissn1573-2959
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::08f95d89032a1c157691522224321d1d
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3135-1471
dc.identifier.pubmed35347461
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127228917
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/39576
dc.identifier.volume194
dc.identifier.wos000773972400004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
dc.rightsCLOSED
dc.subjectWater
dc.subjectHydrogen Peroxide
dc.subjectOxidants
dc.subjectAzo Compounds
dc.subjectEnvironmental Monitoring
dc.titleComparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Kübra Çobanoğlu","name":"Kübra","surname":"Çobanoğlu","rank":1,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Nejdet Değermenci","name":"Nejdet","surname":"Değermenci","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-3135-1471"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0211 other engineering and technologies"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Water"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Hydrogen Peroxide"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"02 engineering and technology"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Oxidants"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Azo Compounds"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"01 natural sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Environmental Monitoring"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0105 earth and related environmental sciences"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are an effective choice for removal of reactive azo dyes used in the textile industry due to high solubility and low degradability. Within the scope of this study, reactive orange 122 (RO122) azo dye was removed using the UV-based AOPs of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, UV/hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2), UV/persulfate (UV/S2O82-), and UV/peroxymonosulfate (UV/HSO5-). Oxidant concentration, initial solution pH, initial RO122 concentration, different anions (Cl-, NO3- and SO42-), and solution temperature effects were compared. With only UV radiation (254 nm), 19.5% RO122 removal occurred at the end of 120 min. The RO122 removal reduced with the UV/oxidant processes at pH 9. Experimental results revealed RO122 removal followed pseudo-first-order (PFO) kinetics. There was a linear correlation identified between initial oxidant concentration and the PFO kinetic rate constant (k1). Among the three UV-based processes, with oxidant concentration 50 mg/L, temperature 20 °C, and pH 5, RO122 removal efficiency was in the order UV/H2O2 > UV/HSO5- > UV/S2O82-. RO122 removal rate increased as initial oxidant concentration and temperature increased and reduced as initial RO122 concentration increased. Energy requirements and oxidant costs were assessed. The UV/H2O2 process was concluded to be the most efficient and economic process for RO122 removal."],"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","issnPrinted":"0167-6369","issnOnline":"1573-2959","issnLinking":null,"ep":null,"iss":null,"sp":null,"vol":"194","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::08f95d89032a1c157691522224321d1d","originalIds":["9964","10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z","50|doiboost____|08f95d89032a1c157691522224321d1d","35347461"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"35347461"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":21,"influence":3.1327734e-9,"popularity":1.532209e-8,"impulse":21,"citationClass":"C4","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z"}],"license":"Springer TDM","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z"],"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"35347461"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35347461"],"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atPubMed

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar