Yayın:
NURİ BİLGE CEYLAN’S NARRATIVES IN NEW TURKISH CINEMA: AN AUTO-ORIENTALIST APPROACH IN ONCE UPON A TIME IN ANATOLIA? OR A POST-ORIENTALIST NEGOTIATION?

dc.contributor.authorErtürk, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T22:33:13Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-16
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the representation of “otherness” in New Turkish Cinema by examining Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s Once Upon a Time in Anatolia within the framework of Orientalism and post-Orientalism. It investigates whether the film’s portrayal of Anatolian rural life reinforces Orientalist discourse or reflects a post-Orientalist vision that redefines otherness through hybridity and cultural negotiation. Drawing on Homi K. Bhabha’s concepts of “hybridity” and the “third space,” the study argues that Ceylan’s depiction of otherness is neither externalized nor romanticized. Instead, it arises through coexistence marked by ambiguity, contradiction, and mutual interaction. The film’s spatial aesthetics invite viewers to question the boundaries between subject and object, center and periphery, East and West, while evoking a sense of being suspended between the finite and the infinite. Through this, Once Upon a Time in Anatolia transcends conventional Orientalist narratives by critiquing both Western perceptions of Turkey and Turkey’s internal construction of the “other.” Ceylan transforms the rural landscape from a site of exoticism into a “third space” of cultural and ideological exchange. The film thus reconfigures otherness as a dynamic process of interaction rather than a fixed opposition. Ultimately, it mediates between Orientalist and post-Orientalist discourses, encouraging audiences to reconsider both Anatolian identity and their own interpretive standpoint.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.1696167
dc.identifier.doi10.20304/humanitas.1696167
dc.identifier.endpage216
dc.identifier.issn2147-088X
dc.identifier.openairedoi_________::858a4d4bdd9f6a67fabf4aecd6feb160
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0007-7397-7102
dc.identifier.startpage194
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/43050
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.publisherNamik Kemal University
dc.relation.ispartofHUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.titleNURİ BİLGE CEYLAN’S NARRATIVES IN NEW TURKISH CINEMA: AN AUTO-ORIENTALIST APPROACH IN ONCE UPON A TIME IN ANATOLIA? OR A POST-ORIENTALIST NEGOTIATION?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Emre Ertürk","name":"Emre","surname":"Ertürk","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid_pending","value":"0009-0007-7397-7102"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":null,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":null,"mainTitle":"NURİ BİLGE CEYLAN’S NARRATIVES IN NEW TURKISH CINEMA: AN AUTO-ORIENTALIST APPROACH IN ONCE UPON A TIME IN ANATOLIA? OR A POST-ORIENTALIST NEGOTIATION?","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">This article explores the representation of “otherness” in New Turkish Cinema by examining Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s Once Upon a Time in Anatolia within the framework of Orientalism and post-Orientalism. It investigates whether the film’s portrayal of Anatolian rural life reinforces Orientalist discourse or reflects a post-Orientalist vision that redefines otherness through hybridity and cultural negotiation. Drawing on Homi K. Bhabha’s concepts of “hybridity” and the “third space,” the study argues that Ceylan’s depiction of otherness is neither externalized nor romanticized. Instead, it arises through coexistence marked by ambiguity, contradiction, and mutual interaction. The film’s spatial aesthetics invite viewers to question the boundaries between subject and object, center and periphery, East and West, while evoking a sense of being suspended between the finite and the infinite. Through this, Once Upon a Time in Anatolia transcends conventional Orientalist narratives by critiquing both Western perceptions of Turkey and Turkey’s internal construction of the “other.” Ceylan transforms the rural landscape from a site of exoticism into a “third space” of cultural and ideological exchange. The film thus reconfigures otherness as a dynamic process of interaction rather than a fixed opposition. Ultimately, it mediates between Orientalist and post-Orientalist discourses, encouraging audiences to reconsider both Anatolian identity and their own interpretive standpoint.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publisher":"Namik Kemal University","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","issnPrinted":"2147-088X","issnOnline":null,"issnLinking":null,"ep":"216","iss":null,"sp":"194","vol":"13","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_________::858a4d4bdd9f6a67fabf4aecd6feb160","originalIds":["10.20304/humanitas.1696167","50|doiboost____|858a4d4bdd9f6a67fabf4aecd6feb160"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.20304/humanitas.1696167"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":0,"influence":2.5349236e-9,"popularity":2.8669784e-9,"impulse":0,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.20304/humanitas.1696167"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.1696167"],"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","refereed":"peerReviewed"}],"isGreen":null,"isInDiamondJournal":null}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar