Browsing by Author "Yozgat, Z."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Anatomical and Functional Results of Early or Late Switching from Anti-VEGF to Dexamethasone Implant in Case of Poor Anatomical Response in Naïve Patients with Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
(Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2024) Yozgat, Z.; Işik, M.U.
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of early or late switching from intravitreal (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection to IV Dexamethasone (DEX) implant injection in treatment-naïve patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: This study included 68 eyes of 68 treatment-naïve BRVO patients who started anti-VEGF treatment. After the loading dose, the patients were divided into two groups: Early DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 3 loading doses) and Late DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 6 months). Visual acuity and examination findings were recorded at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month follow-ups. Optical coherence tomography data were recorded for central macular subfield thickness assessment. Results: A total of 30 (44.1%) women and 38 (55.9%) men participated, and the average age was 67.6 ± 6.4 years. The mean letter gains at week 52 was 15.1 and 20.9 in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively. The group with the highest gain of ≥15 letters was the Late DEX group (26/34 patients) and the gain of ≥15 letters was 14/34 in the Early DEX group (p: 0.006). At week 52, the anatomical gain was 115.3 µm and 136.9 µm in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively. Conclusions: A gain of 15 or more letters was demonstrated to be higher in patients who switched to DEX implant late after anti-VEGF treatment. If it is necessary to switch, the late switch may be more effective for more visual gain at the end of the first year.
Anatomical and Functional Results of Early or Late Switching from Anti-VEGF to Dexamethasone Implant in Case of Poor Anatomical Response in Naïve Patients with Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
(2024) Yozgat, Z.; Işik, M.U.
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of early or late switching from intravitreal (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection to IV Dexamethasone (DEX) implant injection in treatment-naïve patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: This study included 68 eyes of 68 treatment-naïve BRVO patients who started anti-VEGF treatment. After the loading dose, the patients were divided into two groups: Early DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 3 loading doses) and Late DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 6 months). Visual acuity and examination findings were recorded at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month follow-ups. Optical coherence tomography data were recorded for central macular subfield thickness assessment. Results: A total of 30 (44.1%) women and 38 (55.9%) men participated, and the average age was 67.6 ± 6.4 years. The mean letter gains at week 52 was 15.1 and 20.9 in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively. The group with the highest gain of ≥15 letters was the Late DEX group (26/34 patients) and the gain of ≥15 letters was 14/34 in the Early DEX group (p: 0.006). At week 52, the anatomical gain was 115.3 µm and 136.9 µm in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively. Conclusions: A gain of 15 or more letters was demonstrated to be higher in patients who switched to DEX implant late after anti-VEGF treatment. If it is necessary to switch, the late switch may be more effective for more visual gain at the end of the first year.
Anatomical and Functional Results of Early or Late Switching from Anti-VEGF to Dexamethasone Implant in Case of Poor Anatomical Response in Naïve Patients with Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
(2024.01.01) Yozgat, Z.; Isik, M.U.
PurposeTo compare the outcomes of early or late switching from intravitreal (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection to IV Dexamethasone (DEX) implant injection in treatment-naive patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.MethodsThis study included 68 eyes of 68 treatment-naive BRVO patients who started anti-VEGF treatment. After the loading dose, the patients were divided into two groups: Early DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 3 loading doses) and Late DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 6 months). Visual acuity and examination findings were recorded at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month follow-ups. Optical coherence tomography data were recorded for central macular subfield thickness assessment.ResultsA total of 30 (44.1%) women and 38 (55.9%) men participated, and the average age was 67.6 +/- 6.4 years. The mean letter gains at week 52 was 15.1 and 20.9 in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively. The group with the highest gain of >= 15 letters was the Late DEX group (26/34 patients) and the gain of >= 15 letters was 14/34 in the Early DEX group (p: 0.006). At week 52, the anatomical gain was 115.3 mu m and 136.9 mu m in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively.ConclusionsA gain of 15 or more letters was demonstrated to be higher in patients who switched to DEX implant late after anti-VEGF treatment. If it is necessary to switch, the late switch may be more effective for more visual gain at the end of the first year.
Evaluation of the Effect of Topical Prostaglandin Analog Treatment on Orbital Structures in Open-Angle Glaucoma with Computed Tomography
(2024) Ece, B.Ş.D.; Yozgat, Z.; Bayramlı, H.; Ece, B.; Aydin, S.
This study aims to evaluate the computed tomography (CT) scans of glaucoma patients using prostaglandin analogs (PGA) in one eye, investigate findings associated with prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy (PAP), and compare these findings with those of the contralateral eyes. : Patients with open-angle glaucoma who had CT images of the orbital region taken for another reason at least one month after starting PGA treatment in one eye were included in the study. Enophthalmos measurements from thin-slice CT images, along with 3D volume measurements of orbital fat tissue, periorbital muscles, and the optic nerve, were performed. Ophthalmological examination findings and treatment information were collected. The values were compared with those of the contralateral eyes of the same patients not using PGA. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed to evaluate measurement repeatability. : Forty patients were included in the study. Among them, 29 (72.5%) used latanoprost, 9 (22.5%) used bimatoprost, and 2 (5%) used travoprost. The mean enophthalmos values on the treated side (15.5 ± 2.0 mm) were lower than on the untreated side (16.1 ± 1.4 mm), but this difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.07). In 29 patients (72.5%), enophthalmos measurements were smaller on the treated side, with 7 patients (17.5%) showing a difference of 2 mm or more. No significant correlation was found between the duration of PGA use and enophthalmos measurements ( = 0.768 r = -0.048). Additionally, no significant differences were found in orbital fat volume, total extraocular muscle volume, and optic nerve volume ( > 0.05). ICC values demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC > 0.75) for all measurements. : We did not find significant differences in enophthalmos measurements, orbital fat volume, total muscle volume, and optic nerve volume between the PGA-treated and untreated eyes.