Browsing by Author "Tuncer K."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Corticosteroid, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and Ozone Injections for Sinus Tarsi Syndrome
(2023-01-01) Toy S.; Tuncer K.; Topal M.; Aydın A.
BACKGROUND: Sinus tarsi syndrome is characterized by permanent pain on the anterolateral side of the ankle due to chronic inflammation characterized by fibrotic tissue remnants and synovitis accumulation after repeated traumatic injuries. Few studies have documented the outcome of injection treatments for sinus tarsi syndrome. We sought to determine the effects of corticosteroid and local anesthetic (CLA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and ozone injections on sinus tarsi syndrome. METHODS: Sixty patients with sinus tarsi syndrome were randomly divided into three treatment groups: CLA, PRP, and ozone injections. Outcome measures were visual analog scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS), Foot Function Index, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score before injection compared with 1, 3, and 6 months after injection. RESULTS: At the end of months 1, 3, and 6 after injection, significant improvements were observed in all three groups compared with baseline (P < .001 for all). At months 1 and 3, improvements in AOFAS scores were similar in the CLA and ozone groups; those in the PRP group were lower (P = .001 and P = .004, respectively). At month 1, improvements in Foot and Ankle Outcome Score were similar in the PRP and ozone groups and higher in the CLA group (P < .001). At 6-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in visual analog scale and Foot Function Index results among the groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Ozone, CLA, or PRP injections could provide clinically significant functional improvement for at least 6 months in patients with sinus tarsi syndrome.
Impact of presence of ossific nucleus on results of closed reduction in treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (302 hips)
(2021-03-01) Yilar S.; Köse M.; Tuncer K.; Karsan O.; Topal M.; Ezirmik N.
Closed reduction is an effective treatment method for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Still, there are certain controversial issues regarding the timing of the treatment. In this study, we investigated the results of closed reduction and Outcomes of 302 hips of 218 patients treated with closed reduction have been analyzed retrospectively. One hundred fifty-two hips that had ossific nucleus [ossific nucleus (+)] during reduction have been compared with 150 hips that had no ossific nucleus [ossific nucleus (-)] during reduction. Also, the patients have been divided into two groups, the patients treated with closed reduction before the sixth month and the patients treated with closed reduction after the sixth month. Groups have been compared between themselves in terms of avascular necrosis (AVN) and redislocation. Seventy-seven of the 112 hips treated with closed reduction in the first six months were ossific nucleus (-), and AVN has been noted in 5 (6%) patients. However, although no AVN has been seen in any of the 35 ossific nucleus (+) hips, no statistically significant difference has been found between two groups. Seventy-three of the 190 hips treated with closed reduction after the sixth month were ossific nucleus (-), and AVN has been seen in 13 (17%) of these hips. AVN has been seen in 9 (7%) of the 117 ossific nucleus (+) hips. The AVN ratio was found significantly lower in the ossific nucleus (+) hips (P < 0.034). Although the presence of ossific nucleus does not provide extra protection against AVN in before the sixth month, the presence of ossific nucleus is protective against AVN after the sixth month.
Simultaneous versus staged surgeries for the treatment of bilateral developmental hip dysplasia in walking age: A comparison of complications and outcomes
(2021-01-01) Köse M.; Yılar S.; Topal M.; Tuncer K.; Aydın A.; Zencirli K.
Objectives: This study aims to compare the radiological outcomes and rate of complication between single-stage and staged operation for the treatment of bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Patients and methods: A total of 100 patients (13 males, 87 females; mean age: 18.1±2.1 months; range, 12 to 36 months) with bilateral DDH who were older than 15 months of age and treated with open reduction (OR) or Pemberton pericapsular osteotomy (PPO) were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 48 were operated with OR and 52 were operated with PPO. Improvements in acetabular indices, presence of avascular necrosis, radiological results, and other complications were noted. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative acetabular indices, range of International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, follow-up period, and age at the time of operation between the groups (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the acetabular indices, rate of avascular necrosis, and radiological results at the end of 24 months of follow-up between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study results show no significant difference in the radiological outcomes and complications between simultaneous and staged surgeries for the treatment of bilateral DDH in children in the walking age.
The new ultralow dose CT protocol for the diagnosis of fractures of the ankle: A prospective comparative study with conventional CT
(2020-01-01) Tuncer K.; Topal M.; Tekin E.; Sade R.; Pirimoglu R.B.; Polat G.
Purpose: Computerized tomography (CT) imaging is increasingly being used to evaluate patients with ankle trauma. However, conventional CT (C CT) has a significantly higher radiation dose (RD) than plain radiography. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) protocol for ankle fractures. Methods: Ninety-eight consecutive patients who had ankle CT for suspected ankle fracture were included in our prospective study. C CT and ULDCT protocols were simultaneously performed on these 98 patients. Two observers independently evaluated ULDCT and C CT images. The effective RD of the ULDCT and C CT groups was calculated. Results: The interobserver agreement was 1 (perfect). ULDCT and C CT group images showed no significant difference in image quality. The effective RD of the ULDCT was significantly lower than the C CT (p < 0.001). Conclusions: By evaluating the results of this study, ULDCT proved to be a reliable diagnostic imaging method for fractures of the ankle. The satisfactory diagnostic image quality of the ULDCT protocol provides promising results. Level of Evidence: Level II/lesser quality RCT or prospective comparative study.