Browsing by Author "Dogan N."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

A five-level design for evaluating professional development programs: Teaching and learning about nature of science
(2019-01-01) Kartal E.E.; Dogan N.; Irez S.; Cakmakci G.; Yalaki Y.
The aim of this study is to evaluate a continuing professional development (CPD) program designed to improve teachers’ professional competences about the nature of science (NOS) by using a new evaluation perspective. The researchers followed a year long CPD about NOS with the voluntary attendance of 18 middle school science teachers and their students. In a collaborative and reflective environment, teachers were introduced to various NOS aspects and ways to use explicit instruction and formative assessment in their NOS teaching. In addition, teachers received teaching activities and materials to be implemented in their classrooms for one year. The data were collected and evaluated based on the “five level (learning, beliefs, transfer, results, and reaction) evaluation model”. The findings demonstrate that the CPD program about NOS effectively improved teachers’ views about NOS, beliefs about teaching and learning the NOS, classroom practices about NOS and also their students’ views about NOS. This study is the first to use formative assessment and discourse analysis in a professional development program for in-service teacher education, and also first to evaluate teachers’ views, beliefs, practices and their students’ views about NOS all together. The findings are thought to motivate researchers to consider multiple level evaluations of future professional development programs.
Improving science teachers’ nature of science views through an innovative continuing professional development program
(2018-12-01) Erdas Kartal E.; Cobern W.W.; Dogan N.; Irez S.; Cakmakci G.; Yalaki Y.
Background: This study describes how teachers’ nature of science (NOS) views changed throughout an innovative Continuing Professional Development (CPD) program that provided sustained support throughout the process in a collaborative and reflective environment and activities that are consistent with the current curriculum and NOS tenets integrated within. Eighteen in-service science teachers enrolled in a yearlong nature of science, Continuing Professional Development (NOS-CPD) program. Data were collected by pre/post-interviews using the Views of Nature of Science-Form C (VNOS-C) questionnaire, and a post-interview using an open-ended questionnaire developed by researchers to uncover teacher reactions to the NOS-CPD program. Results: The results indicated that the NOS-CPD program improved the teachers’ NOS views more effectively than previously reported short-term teacher development programs, and thus, the findings should be useful for future studies in support of the professional development of teachers. Conclusions: The article concludes with practical advice for implementing NOS-focused, in-service teacher development programs.
The Quality of Pre-service Science Teachers' Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge
(2014-04-30) Cetin P.S.; Dogan N.; Kutluca A.Y.
Research exploring the possible link between quality of argumentation and content knowledge is not straightforward. Some studies suggest a positive relationship (e.g. Dawson & Schibeci in J Biol Educ 38(1):7-12, 2003) while others do not (e.g. Zohar & Nemet in J Res Sci Teach 39:35-62, 2002). This study examined the possible relationship between pre-service science teachers' (PSTs) lines of argument regarding genetic cloning issues and their knowledge of the related content. In the research, pre-service teachers were divided into groups according to the results of a conceptual understanding test on genetic cloning, and were categorized as high, middle and low achievers. After introducing three socio-scientific scenarios (relating to genetic cloning) with the intention of prompting lines of argumentation, the PSTs then participated in semi-structured interviews with the research team. It was revealed that there is not a significant relationship between the quality of socio-scientific argumentation among PSTs and their knowledge of content in the domain of cloning. Explanations for these results are discussed in light of the related literature and with reference to the interviews. © 2014 The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA.