Yayın: Comparison of industrial-scale tubular photobioreactor to FRP (fiberglass reinforced plastic) panel photobioreactor on outdoor culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the marine hatchery
| dc.contributor.author | Durmaz, Yasar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Erbil, Gökhun Çagatay | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-04T14:32:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-09-15 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Microalgal culture is a key procedure in marine fish hatcheries, but this activity is far from optimized and has several problems remain to be solved. Nannochloropsis oculata are important to live feed organisms, which are used to rear the larvae of marine finfish. N. oculata were cultivated in tubular PBR and FRP panel PBR in a greenhouse. Tubular PBR was reached 701.7 x 106 cells mL-1 as its maximum cell density and FRP panel PBR was reached 245 x 106 cells mL-1 as maximum. Also, estimated maximum dry weights of tubular and FRP panel PBRs were calculated as 3.249 g L-1 and 1.47 g L-1, respectively. Consequently, tubular PBR was showed that it is more efficient than FRP panel PBR in this study. | |
| dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13 | |
| dc.description.uri | http://www.egejfas.org/tr/download/article-file/1143681 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/447026 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/80184 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/70440 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/egejfas/issue/52051/636886 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2148-3140 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 308 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1300-1590 | |
| dc.identifier.openaire | doi_dedup___::eeb20dbe7b00a1c34008477a20a45168 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-1858-5882 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-6704-5073 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 303 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/38249 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 37 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 000605750800013 | |
| dc.publisher | Ege University Faculty of Fisheries | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences | |
| dc.rights | OPEN | |
| dc.subject | photobioreactor design | |
| dc.subject | Yapısal Biyoloji | |
| dc.subject | hatchery | |
| dc.subject | Microalgae | |
| dc.subject | Nannochloropsis oculata | |
| dc.subject | hatchery | |
| dc.subject | tubular photobioreactor | |
| dc.subject | FRP panel photobioreactor | |
| dc.subject | photobioreactor design | |
| dc.subject | Structural Biology | |
| dc.subject | Microalgae | |
| dc.subject | FRP panel photobioreactor | |
| dc.subject | Nannochloropsis ocurata | |
| dc.subject | tubular photobioreactor | |
| dc.subject | Mikroalg | |
| dc.subject | Nannochloropsis oculata | |
| dc.subject | kuluçkahane | |
| dc.subject | tübüler fotobiyoreaktör | |
| dc.subject | FRP panel fotobiyoreaktör | |
| dc.subject | fotobiyoreaktör tasarımı | |
| dc.subject.sdg | 7. Clean energy | |
| dc.subject.sdg | 14. Life underwater | |
| dc.title | Comparison of industrial-scale tubular photobioreactor to FRP (fiberglass reinforced plastic) panel photobioreactor on outdoor culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the marine hatchery | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.api.response | {"authors":[{"fullName":"Yasar Durmaz","name":"Yasar","surname":"Durmaz","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-1858-5882"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Gökhun Çagatay Erbil","name":"Gökhun Çagatay","surname":"Erbil","rank":2,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0002-6704-5073"},"provenance":null}}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"photobioreactor design"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0106 biological sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0301 basic medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Yapısal Biyoloji"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"hatchery"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Microalgae;Nannochloropsis oculata;hatchery;tubular photobioreactor;FRP panel photobioreactor;photobioreactor design"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"7. Clean energy"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"01 natural sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"03 medical and health sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Structural Biology"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Microalgae"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"FRP panel photobioreactor"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"14. Life underwater"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Nannochloropsis ocurata"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"tubular photobioreactor"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Mikroalg;Nannochloropsis oculata;kuluçkahane;tübüler fotobiyoreaktör;FRP panel fotobiyoreaktör;fotobiyoreaktör tasarımı"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Comparison of industrial-scale tubular photobioreactor to FRP (fiberglass reinforced plastic) panel photobioreactor on outdoor culture of Nannochloropsis oculata in the marine hatchery","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p>Microalgal culture is a key procedure in marine fish hatcheries, but this activity is far from optimized and has several problems remain to be solved. Nannochloropsis oculata are important to live feed organisms, which are used to rear the larvae of marine finfish. N. oculata were cultivated in tubular PBR and FRP panel PBR in a greenhouse. Tubular PBR was reached 701.7 x 106 cells mL-1 as its maximum cell density and FRP panel PBR was reached 245 x 106 cells mL-1 as maximum. Also, estimated maximum dry weights of tubular and FRP panel PBRs were calculated as 3.249 g L-1 and 1.47 g L-1, respectively. Consequently, tubular PBR was showed that it is more efficient than FRP panel PBR in this study.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publisher":"Ege University Faculty of Fisheries","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Volume: 37, Issue: 3 303-308","2148-3140","Su Ürünleri Dergisi","Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences"],"formats":["application/pdf"],"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","issnPrinted":"1300-1590","issnOnline":"2148-3140","issnLinking":null,"ep":"308","iss":null,"sp":"303","vol":"37","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::eeb20dbe7b00a1c34008477a20a45168","originalIds":["10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13","50|doiboost____|eeb20dbe7b00a1c34008477a20a45168","3042129414","50|od______9436::3e8186051ab7d11a32040a5a8eafec2b","oai:acikerisim.ege.edu.tr:11454/80184","50|od______9436::53ec234c8a5236266a619c7d36a699f0","oai:gcris.ege.edu.tr:11454/80184","50|od______9436::c1c87eb4bd4123df70eb2e8b99b08c35","oai:gcris.ege.edu.tr:11454/70440","oai:acikerisim.ege.edu.tr:11454/70440","50|od______9436::d71d981e57e160f9bc70d48dd90f1251","50|tubitakulakb::2e9a11b4b1c14d041473ee66c01c53dc","oai:dergipark.org.tr:article/636886"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"},{"scheme":"handle","value":"11454/80184"},{"scheme":"handle","value":"11454/70440"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":4,"influence":2.6911924e-9,"popularity":4.5023714e-9,"impulse":1,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"],"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"}],"type":"Article","urls":["http://www.egejfas.org/tr/download/article-file/1143681"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3042129414"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"11454/80184"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/447026","https://hdl.handle.net/11454/80184","https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"],"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"11454/70440"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://hdl.handle.net/11454/70440"],"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"11454/70440"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13","https://hdl.handle.net/11454/70440"],"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.12714/egejfas.37.3.13"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/egejfas/issue/52051/636886"],"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":true,"isInDiamondJournal":false} | |
| local.import.source | OpenAire | |
| local.indexed.at | WOS |
