Yayın:
ÇİN REFORM TECRÜBESİNİN KALKINMA KAVRAMI ÇERÇEVESİNDE YENİDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Basit Görünüm
dc.contributor.authorAtaçay, M. Nergis
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T14:15:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-29
dc.description.abstractKalkinma kavrami uzerine tartismalar 1950’lerde sistemli bir akademik ilgiye donustugunden beri kavramin anlasilmasi konusunda onemli gelismeler kaydedilmistir. Birbirine benzer evreler sonucunda ve ayni yontemlerle her ulkenin kalkinacagi yaklasiminin dogru olmadigi ortaya ciktiktan sonra, kalkinmanin zamana ve soz konusu ulkenin kosullarina bagli olarak gerceklestigi ve beraberinde toplumsal ve kulturel gelismeyle birlikte toplumsal adaleti de getirmesi gerektigi anlayisi ortaya cikmistir. 1970’lerin sonlarinda baslayan reform doneminde butun dunyanin ilgisini ceken bir ekonomik basari kaydeden Cin’in, ayni donemde esitsizlikleri ortadan kaldirmak, dolayisiyla toplumsal adaleti saglamak konusundaki performansi cok da iyi olmamistir. Bu nedenle, Cin’in reform tecrubesinin kalkinma tartismalari cercevesinde ele alinmasi onem kazanmaktadir.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.756958
dc.description.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1171188
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.756958
dc.description.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijmeb/issue/55139/756958
dc.identifier.doi10.17130/ijmeb.756958
dc.identifier.endpage456
dc.identifier.issn2147-9208
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::d31c212a990df04a5578342a89d1cd41
dc.identifier.startpage442
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/38056
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Management Economics and Business
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Management Economics and Business
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectÇin Reform Dönemi
dc.subjectEkonomik Büyüme
dc.subjectEşitsizlikler
dc.subjectKalkınma
dc.titleÇİN REFORM TECRÜBESİNİN KALKINMA KAVRAMI ÇERÇEVESİNDE YENİDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"ATAÇAY, M. Nergis","name":"M. Nergis","surname":"Ataçay","rank":1,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0502 economics and business"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"05 social sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Çin Reform Dönemi;Ekonomik Büyüme;Eşitsizlikler;Kalkınma"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"ÇİN REFORM TECRÜBESİNİN KALKINMA KAVRAMI ÇERÇEVESİNDE YENİDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["Kalkinma kavrami uzerine tartismalar 1950’lerde sistemli bir akademik ilgiye donustugunden beri kavramin anlasilmasi konusunda onemli gelismeler kaydedilmistir. Birbirine benzer evreler sonucunda ve ayni yontemlerle her ulkenin kalkinacagi yaklasiminin dogru olmadigi ortaya ciktiktan sonra, kalkinmanin zamana ve soz konusu ulkenin kosullarina bagli olarak gerceklestigi ve beraberinde toplumsal ve kulturel gelismeyle birlikte toplumsal adaleti de getirmesi gerektigi anlayisi ortaya cikmistir. 1970’lerin sonlarinda baslayan reform doneminde butun dunyanin ilgisini ceken bir ekonomik basari kaydeden Cin’in, ayni donemde esitsizlikleri ortadan kaldirmak, dolayisiyla toplumsal adaleti saglamak konusundaki performansi cok da iyi olmamistir. Bu nedenle, Cin’in reform tecrubesinin kalkinma tartismalari cercevesinde ele alinmasi onem kazanmaktadir."],"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publisher":"International Journal of Management Economics and Business","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref","Volume: 16, Issue: 2 442-456","2147-9208","2147-9194","Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi","International Journal of Management Economics and Business"],"formats":["application/pdf"],"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"International Journal of Management Economics and Business","issnPrinted":"2147-9208","issnOnline":null,"issnLinking":null,"ep":"456","iss":null,"sp":"442","vol":"16","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::d31c212a990df04a5578342a89d1cd41","originalIds":["10.17130/ijmeb.756958","50|doiboost____|d31c212a990df04a5578342a89d1cd41","3037715284","oai:dergipark.org.tr:article/756958","50|tubitakulakb::cd1857c12e6230bcb59f391f6fee65dc"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.17130/ijmeb.756958"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":3,"influence":2.7385825e-9,"popularity":3.7910954e-9,"impulse":2,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.17130/ijmeb.756958"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.756958"],"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.17130/ijmeb.756958"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1171188"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"3037715284"},{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.17130/ijmeb.756958"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.756958"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.17130/ijmeb.756958"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijmeb/issue/55139/756958"],"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar

Publications