Yayın: Comparison of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy
| dc.contributor.author | Yuksel, Erdem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozulken, Kemal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Uzel, Mehmet Murat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Taslipinar Uzel, Ayse Guzin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aydoğan, Semih | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-04T12:51:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-05-07 | |
| dc.description.abstract | To compare the efficacy of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).In this study, patients with bilateral PRK were assigned for the fitting of Lotrafilcon B lens and Samfilcon A lens. The patients were examined on the day of surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Slit biomicroscopy was performed to assess epithelial defect size in the postoperative examinations. The subjective evaluation of pain and visual symptoms was recorded on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3.Analysis was made of 68 eyes of 34 patients who fulfilled the criteria and had PRK for correction of low to moderate myopia/astigmatism. On postoperative days 1 and 2, pain and epiphora scores were significantly lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens (p < 0.001 for all), and on postoperative day 3, the differences were not significant (p = 0.414 and p = 0.180, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two lenses in respect of the levels of photophobia. The difference in epithelial defect size was statistically lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens compared to Lotrafilcon B on day 1 (16.89 mm2 vs. 21.07 mm2; p = 0.003) and day 2 (1.49 mm2 vs. 2.46 mm2; p < 0.001). The difference was not significant on day 3. (0.05 mm2 vs. 0.05 mm2; p = 1.000).The Samfilcon A lens is superior to the Lotrafilcon B lens in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization. | |
| dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31065904 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3232 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9 | |
| dc.description.uri | https://avesis.gazi.edu.tr/publication/details/77aa5a02-9440-4889-bb71-329fb13ee3a6/oai | |
| dc.description.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-2630 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 2574 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0165-5701 | |
| dc.identifier.openaire | doi_dedup___::28b3b87b7ec922882d62f5904056fcfc | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-3713-8815 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 31065904 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85065498979 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 2569 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/37337 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 39 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 000494050000017 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Ophthalmology | |
| dc.rights | CLOSED | |
| dc.subject | Adult | |
| dc.subject | Male | |
| dc.subject | Pain, Postoperative | |
| dc.subject | Time Factors | |
| dc.subject | Ophthalmic Solutions | |
| dc.subject | Adolescent | |
| dc.subject | Silicones | |
| dc.subject | Hydrogels | |
| dc.subject | Equipment Design | |
| dc.subject | Photorefractive keratectomy | |
| dc.subject | Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic | |
| dc.subject | Photorefractive Keratectomy | |
| dc.subject | Young Adult | |
| dc.subject | Cataract | |
| dc.subject | Myopia | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Female | |
| dc.subject | Prospective Studies | |
| dc.subject | Bandages, Hydrocolloid | |
| dc.subject | Follow-Up Studies | |
| dc.title | Comparison of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.api.response | {"authors":[{"fullName":"Erdem Yuksel","name":"Erdem","surname":"Yuksel","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-3713-8815"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Kemal Ozulken","name":"Kemal","surname":"Ozulken","rank":2,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Mehmet Murat Uzel","name":"Mehmet Murat","surname":"Uzel","rank":3,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Ayse Guzin Taslipinar Uzel","name":"Ayse Guzin","surname":"Taslipinar Uzel","rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Semih Aydoğan","name":"Semih","surname":"Aydoğan","rank":5,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Adult"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Male"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0301 basic medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Pain, Postoperative"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Time Factors"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":" Ophthalmic Solutions "},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Adolescent"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Silicones"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Hydrogels"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Equipment Design"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":" Photorefractive keratectomy"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Photorefractive Keratectomy"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Young Adult"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"03 medical and health sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0302 clinical medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Cataract "},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Myopia"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Humans"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Female"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Prospective Studies"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Bandages, Hydrocolloid"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Follow-Up Studies"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Comparison of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["To compare the efficacy of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).In this study, patients with bilateral PRK were assigned for the fitting of Lotrafilcon B lens and Samfilcon A lens. The patients were examined on the day of surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Slit biomicroscopy was performed to assess epithelial defect size in the postoperative examinations. The subjective evaluation of pain and visual symptoms was recorded on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3.Analysis was made of 68 eyes of 34 patients who fulfilled the criteria and had PRK for correction of low to moderate myopia/astigmatism. On postoperative days 1 and 2, pain and epiphora scores were significantly lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens (p < 0.001 for all), and on postoperative day 3, the differences were not significant (p = 0.414 and p = 0.180, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two lenses in respect of the levels of photophobia. The difference in epithelial defect size was statistically lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens compared to Lotrafilcon B on day 1 (16.89 mm2 vs. 21.07 mm2; p = 0.003) and day 2 (1.49 mm2 vs. 2.46 mm2; p < 0.001). The difference was not significant on day 3. (0.05 mm2 vs. 0.05 mm2; p = 1.000).The Samfilcon A lens is superior to the Lotrafilcon B lens in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization."],"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","issnPrinted":"0165-5701","issnOnline":"1573-2630","issnLinking":null,"ep":"2574","iss":null,"sp":"2569","vol":"39","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::28b3b87b7ec922882d62f5904056fcfc","originalIds":["1105","10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9","50|doiboost____|28b3b87b7ec922882d62f5904056fcfc","31065904","50|dris___02022::754b28269ce25714fd88844f30952dda","oai:gcris.etu.edu.tr:Publications/20.500.11851/3232","2944401862","77aa5a02-9440-4889-bb71-329fb13ee3a6","50|od_____10046::b99433f499496cba33ea800d8cb51728","oai:gcris.etu.edu.tr:20.500.11851/3232","50|od______4483::61330561ef149d4ef6f839efd7ca3ca5"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"31065904"},{"scheme":"handle","value":"20.500.11851/3232"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":11,"influence":2.9956337e-9,"popularity":8.479644e-9,"impulse":7,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"license":"Springer TDM","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"],"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"31065904"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31065904"],"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"20.500.11851/3232"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"type":"Other literature type","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9","https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3232"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"2944401862"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://avesis.gazi.edu.tr/publication/details/77aa5a02-9440-4889-bb71-329fb13ee3a6/oai"],"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"20.500.11851/3232"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9","https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3232"],"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false} | |
| local.import.source | OpenAire | |
| local.indexed.at | WOS | |
| local.indexed.at | Scopus | |
| local.indexed.at | PubMed |
