Yayın:
Comparison of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy

dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorOzulken, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorUzel, Mehmet Murat
dc.contributor.authorTaslipinar Uzel, Ayse Guzin
dc.contributor.authorAydoğan, Semih
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T12:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-07
dc.description.abstractTo compare the efficacy of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).In this study, patients with bilateral PRK were assigned for the fitting of Lotrafilcon B lens and Samfilcon A lens. The patients were examined on the day of surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Slit biomicroscopy was performed to assess epithelial defect size in the postoperative examinations. The subjective evaluation of pain and visual symptoms was recorded on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3.Analysis was made of 68 eyes of 34 patients who fulfilled the criteria and had PRK for correction of low to moderate myopia/astigmatism. On postoperative days 1 and 2, pain and epiphora scores were significantly lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens (p < 0.001 for all), and on postoperative day 3, the differences were not significant (p = 0.414 and p = 0.180, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two lenses in respect of the levels of photophobia. The difference in epithelial defect size was statistically lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens compared to Lotrafilcon B on day 1 (16.89 mm2 vs. 21.07 mm2; p = 0.003) and day 2 (1.49 mm2 vs. 2.46 mm2; p < 0.001). The difference was not significant on day 3. (0.05 mm2 vs. 0.05 mm2; p = 1.000).The Samfilcon A lens is superior to the Lotrafilcon B lens in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31065904
dc.description.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3232
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9
dc.description.urihttps://avesis.gazi.edu.tr/publication/details/77aa5a02-9440-4889-bb71-329fb13ee3a6/oai
dc.description.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9
dc.identifier.eissn1573-2630
dc.identifier.endpage2574
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::28b3b87b7ec922882d62f5904056fcfc
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3713-8815
dc.identifier.pubmed31065904
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065498979
dc.identifier.startpage2569
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/37337
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wos000494050000017
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Ophthalmology
dc.rightsCLOSED
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPain, Postoperative
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectOphthalmic Solutions
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectSilicones
dc.subjectHydrogels
dc.subjectEquipment Design
dc.subjectPhotorefractive keratectomy
dc.subjectContact Lenses, Hydrophilic
dc.subjectPhotorefractive Keratectomy
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.subjectCataract
dc.subjectMyopia
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectBandages, Hydrocolloid
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies
dc.titleComparison of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"Erdem Yuksel","name":"Erdem","surname":"Yuksel","rank":1,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-3713-8815"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"Kemal Ozulken","name":"Kemal","surname":"Ozulken","rank":2,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Mehmet Murat Uzel","name":"Mehmet Murat","surname":"Uzel","rank":3,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Ayse Guzin Taslipinar Uzel","name":"Ayse Guzin","surname":"Taslipinar Uzel","rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"Semih Aydoğan","name":"Semih","surname":"Aydoğan","rank":5,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":null,"publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"eng","label":"English"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Adult"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Male"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0301 basic medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Pain, Postoperative"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Time Factors"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":" Ophthalmic Solutions "},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Adolescent"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Silicones"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Hydrogels"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Equipment Design"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":" Photorefractive keratectomy"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Photorefractive Keratectomy"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Young Adult"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"03 medical and health sciences"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"FOS","value":"0302 clinical medicine"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Cataract "},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Myopia"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Humans"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Female"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Prospective Studies"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Bandages, Hydrocolloid"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Follow-Up Studies"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Comparison of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["To compare the efficacy of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).In this study, patients with bilateral PRK were assigned for the fitting of Lotrafilcon B lens and Samfilcon A lens. The patients were examined on the day of surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Slit biomicroscopy was performed to assess epithelial defect size in the postoperative examinations. The subjective evaluation of pain and visual symptoms was recorded on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3.Analysis was made of 68 eyes of 34 patients who fulfilled the criteria and had PRK for correction of low to moderate myopia/astigmatism. On postoperative days 1 and 2, pain and epiphora scores were significantly lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens (p < 0.001 for all), and on postoperative day 3, the differences were not significant (p = 0.414 and p = 0.180, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two lenses in respect of the levels of photophobia. The difference in epithelial defect size was statistically lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens compared to Lotrafilcon B on day 1 (16.89 mm2 vs. 21.07 mm2; p = 0.003) and day 2 (1.49 mm2 vs. 2.46 mm2; p < 0.001). The difference was not significant on day 3. (0.05 mm2 vs. 0.05 mm2; p = 1.000).The Samfilcon A lens is superior to the Lotrafilcon B lens in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization."],"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_14cb","label":"CLOSED","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","issnPrinted":"0165-5701","issnOnline":"1573-2630","issnLinking":null,"ep":"2574","iss":null,"sp":"2569","vol":"39","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::28b3b87b7ec922882d62f5904056fcfc","originalIds":["1105","10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9","50|doiboost____|28b3b87b7ec922882d62f5904056fcfc","31065904","50|dris___02022::754b28269ce25714fd88844f30952dda","oai:gcris.etu.edu.tr:Publications/20.500.11851/3232","2944401862","77aa5a02-9440-4889-bb71-329fb13ee3a6","50|od_____10046::b99433f499496cba33ea800d8cb51728","oai:gcris.etu.edu.tr:20.500.11851/3232","50|od______4483::61330561ef149d4ef6f839efd7ca3ca5"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"},{"scheme":"pmid","value":"31065904"},{"scheme":"handle","value":"20.500.11851/3232"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":11,"influence":2.9956337e-9,"popularity":8.479644e-9,"impulse":7,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C4","popularityClass":"C4"}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"license":"Springer TDM","type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"],"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"pmid","value":"31065904"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31065904"],"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"20.500.11851/3232"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"type":"Other literature type","urls":["https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9","https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3232"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"},{"scheme":"mag_id","value":"2944401862"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"],"refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://avesis.gazi.edu.tr/publication/details/77aa5a02-9440-4889-bb71-329fb13ee3a6/oai"],"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"handle","value":"20.500.11851/3232"}],"alternateIdentifiers":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9","https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3232"],"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":false,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atPubMed

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar