Yayın:
Use of some multicriteria decision-making methods such as grey relational analysis (GRA), the complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), and weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) in selection of some Anatolian pine (Pinus nigra Arnold.) origi

dc.contributor.authorAYDINHAN, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorOZEL, Halil Baris
dc.contributor.authorIMREN, Erol
dc.contributor.authorKURT, Rifat
dc.contributor.authorSEVIK, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-04T17:42:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-30
dc.description.abstractAiming to determine the quantitative sapling characteristics that are important for sapling nursing methods, the present study was carried out on 2-year-old naked root Anatolian Black Pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe) saplings obtained from four different seed origins from Denizli Forest Sapling Nursery Directorate. In this study, the selection of these four seed origins was examined using multicriteria decision-making methods (MCDM) by the determination of quantitative differences between origins and the use of suitable origins in practice. Within the context of the present study, the weight coefficients (significance degrees) of saplings such as height, root neck diameter, and last-year shoot length, and root length were measured using the Criteria Importance Through Intercritera Correlation (CRITIC) method. Secondly, the development performances of these four black pine origins were examined using Grey Relation Analysis (GRA), The Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods. Besides that, since CRITIC-based GRA, COPRAS, and WASPAS methods showed complete consistency in terms of performance ranking, proportional values were very close to each other, and these methods have positive and very high levels of relationships with each other, it was considered that these methods can be alternative to each other in any measurement ranking or performance measurement. Accordingly, all these multicriteria decision-making methods (GRA, COPRAS, and WASPA) were successfully implemented in origin selection. Given the results obtained, it was determined that, in all three methods, İnceler origin ranked first and Çatak origin ranked last.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1374
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7902926
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7902925
dc.identifier.doi10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1374
dc.identifier.eissn2581-9615
dc.identifier.endpage552
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::78a1249ec1e3df917a56540add0e1439
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2789-9119
dc.identifier.startpage539
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/40296
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.publisherGSC Online Press
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectBlack pine
dc.subjectCOPRAS
dc.subjectGRA
dc.subjectMulticriteria decision-making
dc.subjectSemi-arid area
dc.subjectMethods
dc.subjectWASPAS
dc.subject.sdg15. Life on land
dc.titleUse of some multicriteria decision-making methods such as grey relational analysis (GRA), the complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), and weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) in selection of some Anatolian pine (Pinus nigra Arnold.) origi
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.api.response{"authors":[{"fullName":"AYDINHAN, Volkan","name":"Volkan","surname":"AYDINHAN","rank":1,"pid":null},{"fullName":"OZEL, Halil Baris","name":"Halil Baris","surname":"OZEL","rank":2,"pid":null},{"fullName":"IMREN, Erol","name":"Erol","surname":"IMREN","rank":3,"pid":{"id":{"scheme":"orcid","value":"0000-0003-2789-9119"},"provenance":null}},{"fullName":"KURT, Rifat","name":"Rifat","surname":"KURT","rank":4,"pid":null},{"fullName":"SEVIK, Hakan","name":"Hakan","surname":"SEVIK","rank":5,"pid":null}],"openAccessColor":"gold","publiclyFunded":false,"type":"publication","language":{"code":"und","label":"Undetermined"},"countries":null,"subjects":[{"subject":{"scheme":"SDG","value":"15. Life on land"},"provenance":null},{"subject":{"scheme":"keyword","value":"Black pine; COPRAS; GRA; Multicriteria decision-making; Semi-arid area; Methods; WASPAS"},"provenance":null}],"mainTitle":"Use of some multicriteria decision-making methods such as grey relational analysis (GRA), the complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), and weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) in selection of some Anatolian pine (Pinus nigra Arnold.) origi","subTitle":null,"descriptions":["<jats:p>Aiming to determine the quantitative sapling characteristics that are important for sapling nursing methods, the present study was carried out on 2-year-old naked root Anatolian Black Pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe) saplings obtained from four different seed origins from Denizli Forest Sapling Nursery Directorate. In this study, the selection of these four seed origins was examined using multicriteria decision-making methods (MCDM) by the determination of quantitative differences between origins and the use of suitable origins in practice. Within the context of the present study, the weight coefficients (significance degrees) of saplings such as height, root neck diameter, and last-year shoot length, and root length were measured using the Criteria Importance Through Intercritera Correlation (CRITIC) method. Secondly, the development performances of these four black pine origins were examined using Grey Relation Analysis (GRA), The Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods. Besides that, since CRITIC-based GRA, COPRAS, and WASPAS methods showed complete consistency in terms of performance ranking, proportional values were very close to each other, and these methods have positive and very high levels of relationships with each other, it was considered that these methods can be alternative to each other in any measurement ranking or performance measurement. Accordingly, all these multicriteria decision-making methods (GRA, COPRAS, and WASPA) were successfully implemented in origin selection. Given the results obtained, it was determined that, in all three methods, İnceler origin ranked first and Çatak origin ranked last.</jats:p>"],"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publisher":"GSC Online Press","embargoEndDate":null,"sources":["Crossref"],"formats":null,"contributors":null,"coverages":null,"bestAccessRight":{"code":"c_abf2","label":"OPEN","scheme":"http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/documentation/access_rights/"},"container":{"name":"World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews","issnPrinted":null,"issnOnline":"2581-9615","issnLinking":null,"ep":"552","iss":null,"sp":"539","vol":"16","edition":null,"conferencePlace":null,"conferenceDate":null},"documentationUrls":null,"codeRepositoryUrl":null,"programmingLanguage":null,"contactPeople":null,"contactGroups":null,"tools":null,"size":null,"version":null,"geoLocations":null,"id":"doi_dedup___::78a1249ec1e3df917a56540add0e1439","originalIds":["10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1374","50|doiboost____|9a4a7e415f05192bd4e91f4f5376adb2","50|datacite____::78a1249ec1e3df917a56540add0e1439","10.5281/zenodo.7902926","50|datacite____::cfb92d5159558be9e90e1b29195faf65","10.5281/zenodo.7902925"],"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1374"},{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.5281/zenodo.7902926"},{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.5281/zenodo.7902925"}],"dateOfCollection":null,"lastUpdateTimeStamp":null,"indicators":{"citationImpact":{"citationCount":1,"influence":2.5540658e-9,"popularity":2.6278597e-9,"impulse":1,"citationClass":"C5","influenceClass":"C5","impulseClass":"C5","popularityClass":"C5"},"usageCounts":{"downloads":14,"views":7}},"instances":[{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1374"}],"type":"Article","urls":["https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1374"],"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","refereed":"peerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.5281/zenodo.7902926"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7902926"],"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"},{"pids":[{"scheme":"doi","value":"10.5281/zenodo.7902925"}],"license":"CC BY","type":"Article","urls":["https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7902925"],"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","refereed":"nonPeerReviewed"}],"isGreen":true,"isInDiamondJournal":false}
local.import.sourceOpenAire

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar