Karavas, Erdal, Ece, Bunyamin, Aydın, SonayKaravas, E, Ece, B, Aydin, S2023-05-092023-05-092022-07-282022.01.011949-8470https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12597/12036Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with multiparametric dynamic contrast plays a critical role in the assessment of breast lesions. Dynamic curves are a critical parameter in determining the benign or malignant nature of lesions. Dynamic curves of type 1 are known to represent benign masses, while dynamic curves of type 3 are known to identify malignant masses. Type 2 dynamic curves have a sensitivity of 42.6% and specificity of 75% for malignancy detection.To investigate the pathological diagnosis of lesions with type 2 dynamic curves.We evaluated breast MRI examinations performed between 2020 and 2021 retrospectively and included lesions with type 2 dynamic curves. We included 38 lesions from 33 patients. The lesions were evaluated for their pathological diagnosis and morphological characteristics.Twenty-six lesions were malignant, while twelve were benign. The most frequently encountered benign lesion (7/12, 58.3%) was sclerosing adenosis, while the most frequently encountered malignant diagnosis was invasive ductal cancer. The presence of a type 2 dynamic curve had a sensitivity of 40.2% and specificity of 73.4% for predicting malignancy. By combining type 2 curves and morphological features, the sensitivity and specificity were increased.The high rates of malignancy detected histopathologically among patients with type 2 dynamic curves in our study are remarkable. Type 2 dynamic curves can be detected in benign breast masses, especially in sclerosing adenosis cases. Considering morphological features can increase the diagnostic accuracy in cases with type 2 dynamic curves.BenignBreastDynamic curveMagnetic resonance imagingMalignantType 2Type 2 dynamic curves: A diagnostic dilemma.Type 2 dynamic curves: A diagnostic dilemmaJournal Article10.4329/wjr.v14.i7.229WOS:0008372550000053616062722923714